Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):88-104 (2013)

Authors
Scott Forschler
University of Minnesota
Abstract
Richard Hare argues that the fundamental assumptions of Kant's ethical system should have led Kant to utilitarianism, had Kant not confused a norm's generality with its universality, and hence adopted rigorist, deontological norms. Several authors, including Jens Timmermann, have argued contra Hare that the gap between Kantian and utilitarian/consequentialist ethics is fundamental and cannot be bridged. This article shows that Timmermann's claims rely on a systematic failure to separate normative and metaethical aspects of each view, and that Hare's attempt to bridge the gap between Kantian and consequentialist ethics is immune to Timmermann's criticisms. Furthermore, the term “Kantian ethics” is often misleading, and should typically be qualified as either “Kantian rationalism” or “Kantian deontology” in order to avoid confusions of the sort Timmermann falls into
Keywords Kantian ethics  Deontology  Consequentialism  Hare, Richard  Moral Universalization  Utilitarianism  Meta-ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/meta.12015
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,089
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Practical Philosophy.Immanuel Kant - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis.Frank Jackson - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (197):539-542.
Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1996 - In Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 37-108.
Kantian Consequentialism.David Cummiskey - 1990 - Ethics 100 (3):586-615.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Kant, Eudaimonism, Act-Consequentialism and the Fact of Reason.Martin Sticker - 2020 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 102 (2):209-241.
Rejoinder to Wall.Scott Forschler - 2017 - Metaphilosophy 48 (4):572-574.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Virtue Ethics, Kantian Ethics, and Consequentialism.Jane Singleton - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:537-551.
Kantian Consequentialism.David Cummiskey - 1990 - Ethics 100 (3):586-615.
A Kantian Approach to Codes of Ethics.Jacquie L'Etang - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (10):737 - 744.
How to Make Ethical Universalization Tests Work.Scott Forschler - 2007 - Journal of Value Inquiry 41 (1):31-43.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-01-09

Total views
183 ( #63,131 of 2,498,995 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #139,467 of 2,498,995 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes