Utilitas 17 (3):243-264 (2005)

Authors
Jens Timmermann
University of St. Andrews
Abstract
In 1993, Richard Hare argued that, contrary to received opinion, Kant could have been a utilitarian. In this article, I argue that Hare was wrong. Kant's theory would not have been utilitarian or consequentialist even if his practical recommendations coincided with utilitarian commands: Kant's theory of value is essentially anti-utilitarian; there is no place for rational contradiction as the source of moral imperatives in utilitarianism; Kant would reject the move to separate levels of moral thinking: first-order moral judgement makes use of the principle of morality; and, relatedly, he would resist the common utilitarian distinction between actions and their motives because any correct description of an action must refer to motivation. The article concludes with the thought that any consequentialist theory based on pre-given ends (teleology) lacks the philosophical resources to distinguish between willing something as a means and as an end, leaving means only, and destroying transparency.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0953820805001639
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Kant, Eudaimonism, Act-Consequentialism and the Fact of Reason.Martin Sticker - 2020 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 102 (2):209-241.
Moral Metaphysics.Daniel Star - 2013 - In Roger Crisp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics. Oxford University Press.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Critique of the Preference Utilitarian Objection to Killing People.Suzanne Uniacke - 2002 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (2):209 – 217.
Moral Rules and Particular Circumstances.Baruch A. Brody - 1970 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.
A Utilitarian Reply to Dr. McCloskey.T. L. S. Sprigge - 1965 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):264 – 291.
Manned Space Travel as a Cultural Mission.Carl Gethmann - 2006 - Poiesis and Praxis 4 (4):239-252.
Human Dignity and Non-Utilitarian Consequentialist "Ethics of Social Consequences".Vasil Gluchman - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1 (7):159-165.
Humanism and Morality.Brian Ellis - 2011 - Sophia 50 (1):135-139.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
169 ( #69,261 of 2,505,145 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,004 of 2,505,145 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes