The Legal Consequences of Research Misconduct: False Investigators and Grant Proposals

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (2):331-339 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a survey on research misconduct, roughly 20% of the respondents admitted that they have submitted federal grant proposals that include scholars as research participants even though those scholars were not expected to contribute to the research effort. This manuscript argues that adding such false investigators is illegal, violating multiple federal statutes including the False Statements Act, the False Claims Act, and False, Fictitious, or Fraudulent Claims. Moreover, it is not only the offending academics and the false investigators that face civil and criminal penalties because administrators may also be liable if they sign off on proposals and are in a position to know that false investigators might be included. Policy recommendations that should reduce the use of false investigators include changing institutional cultures, better training and oversight of the responsible conduct of research, and, most importantly, making all grant reviews double blind.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
Criminalization of scientific misconduct.William Bülow & Gert Helgesson - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (2):245-252.
False Accusations of Sexual Abuse: Psychiatry's Latest Reign of Error.Lee Coleman - 1990 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 11 (3-4):545-556.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-07

Downloads
21 (#723,160)

6 months
6 (#510,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?