Using Criminalization and Due Process to Reduce Scientific Misconduct

American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):W1-W7 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The issue of how to best minimize scientific misconduct remains a controversial topic among bioethicists, professors, policymakers, and attorneys. This paper suggests that harsher criminal sanctions against misconduct, better protections for whistleblowers, and the creation of due process standards for misconduct investigations are urgently needed. Although the causes of misconduct and estimates of problem remain varied, the literature suggests that scientific misconduct—fraud, fabrication, and plagiarism of scientific research—continues to damage public health and trust in science. Providing stricter criminal statutes against misconduct is necessary to motivate whistleblowers and deter wrongdoers, and the provision of basic due process protections is necessary for ensuring a fair and balanced misconduct investigation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,506

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

No One Likes a Snitch.Barbara Redman & Arthur Caplan - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (4):813-819.
Criminalization of scientific misconduct.William Bülow & Gert Helgesson - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (2):245-252.
Research Misconduct and Medical Journals.Howard Bauchner, Robert Steinbrook & Rita F. Redberg - forthcoming - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics:1-6.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
65 (#356,594)

6 months
5 (#851,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?