Remuneration in the United States and Mexico: Assessing the level of influence on potential clinical research participants about their decision to participate in a clinical trial and the risk of fraud

Clinical Ethics 13 (2):98-105 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Monetary compensation given to study subjects in a clinical trial is an effective tool to increase overall study enrolment, nonetheless it may stimulate some participants to commit fraud and lie about their medical history.A survey-study in 684 Hispanic prospective subjects in Mexico and USA was conducted to evaluate if a high monetary compensation would encourage them to lie about their medical history. Almost half of the subjects considered participating in a clinical trial with no compensation. Younger male individuals were more likely to consider committing fraud in order to receive a relatively high compensation. On the other hand, individuals with either low or high educational backgrounds, as those with higher income, were less likely to consider committing fraud.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Right to Participate in High-Risk Research.David Shaw - 2014 - The Lancet 38:1009 – 1011.
Translating Trial Results in Clinical Practice: the Risk GP Model.Jonathan Fuller & Luis J. Flores - 2016 - Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research 9:167-168.
Compellingness: assessing the practical relevance of clinical research results.Mark R. Tonelli - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (5):962-967.
Space for the Prisoner's Point of View.Laura Haupt - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (2):2-2.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-10

Downloads
15 (#943,292)

6 months
5 (#628,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?