Questionable research practices of medical and dental faculty in Pakistan – a confession

BMC Medical Ethics 25 (1):1-8 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose Intellectual honesty and integrity are the cornerstones of conducting any form of research. Over the last few years, scholars have shown great concerns over questionable research practices (QRPs) in academia. This study aims to investigate the questionable research practices amongst faculty members of medical and dental colleges in Pakistan. Method A descriptive multi-institutional online survey was conducted from June-August 2022. Based on previous studies assessing research misconduct, 43 questionable research practices in four domains: Data collection & storage, Data analysis, Study reporting and Collaboration & authorship were identified and investigated. Descriptive (Frequencies, Percentages, Mean, SD) and Inferential (chi square) statistics were calculated. Results A total of 654 faculty members responded. Every respondent reported committing at least one QRP in their career. The most common QRPs included deliberately failing to mention funding, publishing program evaluation data not meant for research purposes or approved by an ethical body, inappropriately storing identifiable information and non-disclosure of any conflicts. There was significant association of age, gender and academic rank with QRPs in ‘Data collection and storage’ and ‘Data Analysis’ domains. Conclusion Medical and dental faculty members participating in this study are involved in a range of questionable research practices (QRPs) in Pakistan. Their confession might have contributed to the faculty developing self-awareness and reinforcing academic integrity. There is a need for reviewing policies and practices to improve research culture. Future research should explore the factors resulting in such practices.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral agents in medical research and practice.Wim Dekkers & Bert Gordijn - 2009 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (1):1-2.
Value practices in the life sciences and medicine.Isabelle Dussauge, Claes-Fredrik Helgesson & Francis Lee (eds.) - 2015 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
A few remarks on limits of research risks and research payments.Joanna Różyńska - 2023 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 26 (1):155-156.
Editorial: Research ethics.Henk A. M. J. ten Have - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (1):1-3.
Editorial: Research ethics.A. M. J. Henk - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (1):1-3.
An argument against research on people with intellectual disabilities.S. D. Edwards - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (1):69-73.
Biomedical research policies: Moral insight or a compromise?Eugenijus Gefenas - 1999 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (2):205-207.
Leaders in ethics education.Berna Arda - 2019 - International Journal of Ethics Education 4 (1):83-92.
Is medicine still good for us?: a primer for the 21st century.Julian Sheather - 2019 - London: Thames & Hudson. Edited by Matthew Taylor.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-01

Downloads
12 (#1,085,484)

6 months
12 (#213,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?