Abuses and Apologies: Irresponsible Conduct of Human Subjects Research in Latin America

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (1):353-368 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the vulnerability of Latin American human subjects, and how their vulnerability is ignored due to the complexities and inconsistencies of oversight committees and institutional policies. Secondly, the concept of apology is examined and its meaning to victims of past research abuses

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/jlme.12025

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Official apologies in the aftermath of political violence.Ernesto Verdeja - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (4):563-581.
Confining choices: Should inmates' participation in research be limited?Lynn Pasquerella - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (6):519-536.
New Rules for Research with Human Participants?Jessica Berg & Nicole Deming - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (6):10-11.
Research ethics in internet-enabled research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia. [REVIEW]Joseph B. Walther - 2002 - Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3):205-216.
Culture and international anti-corruption agreements in latin America.Bryan W. Husted - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (4):413 - 422.
Human and animal research guidelines: Aligning ethical constructs with new scientific developments.Hope Ferdowsian - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (8):472-478.
The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants.Carol Levine, Ruth Faden, Christine Grady, Dale Hammerschmidt, Lisa Eckenwiler & Jeremy Sugarman - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):44 – 49.
A comparative analysis of biomedical research ethics regulation systems in Europe and Latin America with regard to the protection of human subjects.E. Lamas, M. Ferrer, A. Molina, R. Salinas, A. Hevia, A. Bota, D. Feinholz, M. Fuchs, R. Schramm, J. -C. Tealdi & S. Zorrilla - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (12):750-753.
Responsible conduct of research.Adil E. Shamoo - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David B. Resnik.
Revolution or Reform in Human Subjects Research Oversight.Steven Joffe - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):922-929.
The ethics and politics of human experimentation.Paul Murray McNeill - 1993 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Paying Human Subjects in Research: Where Are We, How Did We Get Here, and Now What?Ari VanderWalde & Seth Kurzban - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):543-558.
Non-human primates: the appropriate subjects of biomedical research?M. Quigley - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (11):655-658.
Vulnerable Embryos.Stephen Napier - 2010 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (4):781-810.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-18

Downloads
102 (#165,265)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A Free-Market Approach to Clinical Data Gathering Is More Ethical.Michael Keane - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (9):19-21.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Bioethics, vulnerability, and protection.Ruth Macklin - 2003 - Bioethics 17 (5-6):472--486.
Vulnerability: What kind of principle is it?Michael H. Kottow - 2005 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (3):281-287.
The apology paradox.Janna Thompson - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (201):470-475.

View all 13 references / Add more references