Self and Transcendence: A Study in the Phenomenology of Religion

Dissertation, University of South Carolina (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Immanuel Kant's epistemology dealt a crippling blow to the possibility of obtaining knowledge of transcendent reality. In the course of this project I examine an Augustinian line of thought in the philosophy of religion that has not received much attention. The line is found in the work of Max Scheler, Maurice Blondel and Louis Dupre, who saw the potential and limitations of engaging in a phenomenological investigation of religious experiences. Scheler, Blondel and Dupre argued for the insufficiency of philosophy to establish a traditional proof for the existence or non-existence of god, and they also pointed to the benefits of a phenomenological approach. ;The motivation for my project is twofold. In Louis Dupre's work he pointed to a contemporary crisis of self. We are bequeathed the Socratic precepts of "know thyself" and "the unexamined life is not worth living". According to Dupre, however, we may not know what we mean by "self", due to our focus on the self as entirely rational, active, free and creative. We ignore the passive element of self constitution. Although the seeds of this concept of self were brought to fruition in the Enlightenment, the utterly active concept of self remains with us. Dupre argued that we need a fully developed concept of self that includes its passivity and transcendent nature, and considers the possibility of connecting the self to transcendent reality. ;The other impetus for my project is my own goal of gaining insight into diverse viewpoints or belief systems. In our current global situation of competing truth claims and worldviews, I think much can be accomplished by seeking to understand others' positions and beliefs. Phenomenology can aid in the process of gaining insight for three reasons: The phenomenologist looks at what is given to intuition; The phenomenologist analyzes the meaning of the given; The phenomenologist does not seek to provide proofs, but only to describe phenomena. ;While Husserl's radical phenomenological epoche did not leave an avenue to transcendent reality, Scheler, Blondel and Dupre found an approach possible if phenomenology is identified with the three points above rather than the epoche.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Phenomenological Sociology as Appropriated by Max Scheler.Carlo Kwan - 2004 - Philosophy and Culture 31 (5):157-171.
Max Scheler on Philosophy and Religion.Alexander von Schoenborn - 1974 - International Philosophical Quarterly 14 (3):285-308.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references