Reply to Crispin Wright

In R. E. Auxier & L. E. Hahn (eds.), The Philosophy of Michael Dummett. Open Court. pp. 445--454 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Replies.Crispin Wright - 2012 - In Annalisa Coliva (ed.), Mind, meaning, and knowledge: themes from the philosophy of Crispin Wright. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 201-219.
Inexplicit?Reply to Bob Hale & Crispin Wright’S. - 2010 - In Bernhard Weiss & Jeremy Wanderer (eds.), Reading Brandom: On Making It Explicit. Routledge.
Realism, pure and simple-a reply to Williamson, Timothy.Crispin Wright - 1994 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2 (2):327-341.
Critical Notice of Crispin Wright Truth and Objectivity.Michel Seymour - 1995 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):637-658.
About “The Philosophical Significance of Gödel's Theorem”: Some Issues.Crispin Wright - 1994 - In Brian McGuiness & Gianluigi Oliveri (eds.), The Philosophy of Michael Dummett. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 167--202.
Dummett's critique of Wright's attempt to resuscitate Frege.Bob Hale - 1994 - Philosophia Mathematica 2 (2):122-147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
2 (#1,802,998)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references