Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger: Epistemic Standards and Moral Beliefs

Logos and Episteme 11 (1):29-51 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Much work in moral epistemology is devoted to explaining apparent asymmetries between moral and non-moral epistemology. These asymmetries include testimony, expertise, and disagreement. Surprisingly, these asymmetries have been addressed in isolation from each other, and the explanations offered have been piecemeal, rather than holistic. In this paper, I provide the only unified account on offer of these asymmetries. According to this unified account, moral beliefs typically have a higher epistemic standard than non-moral beliefs. This means, roughly, that it is typically more difficult for agents to receive the relevant positive epistemic credit for moral beliefs than for non-moral beliefs. After presenting this account, I consider two alternative unified accounts. According to the first alternative, moral matters are more cognitively demanding; according to the second, moral beliefs have more defeaters. I argue that neither of these alternative accounts succeed, and that my higher standards account is the best unified explanation.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Explanations of Moral Beliefs.Don Loeb - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):193-208.
Moral explanations of moral beliefs.Don Loeb - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):193–208.
What is wrong with moral testimony?Robert Hopkins - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3):611-634.
Moral conversion without moral realism.Bruce N. Waller - 1992 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):129-137.
Is, Ought, and the Regress Argument.Jacob Sparks - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (3):528-543.
The epistemology of moral disagreement.Richard Rowland - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (2):1-16.
Which Causes of Moral Beliefs Matter?Elizabeth O’Neill - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):1070-1080.
Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments.R. Jay Wallace - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (3):680-681.
Moral-Conative Relations and Metaethics.Jonathan Andrew Tresan - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill


Added to PP

9 (#937,631)

6 months
1 (#451,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicole Dular
Franklin College, Indiana

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references