I Would like to, but I can’t. An Online Survey on the Moral Challenges of German Farm Veterinarians

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 33 (3):447-460 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The job of veterinarians is often described as morally challenging. This online survey (n = 123) investigated how farm veterinarians in Germany perceive these challenges. Most participants described their job in accordance with the literature: as a profession that regularly has to deal with morally difficult decisions. The majority assumed that their moral challenges were greater than the ones of small animal practitioners. The results indicate that the typical moral challenges are (a) situations in which the farm veterinarians are convinced to know what is morally right, however, specific external obstacles prevent them from implementing their convictions. Therefore, the central moral problem from the veterinarians’ point of view can be described with the following words: “I would like to, but I can’t.” Other ideal types of moral challenges like (b) open ethical questions, (c) ethical dilemmas or (d) “duty vs. inclination” conflicts play a less prominent role. With regard to dealing with these challenges, the study shows that farm veterinarians are looking for exchange, for example with colleagues. Most participants see the current social debate about livestock farming as something that stresses them, arguing that their university’s curriculum did not adequately prepare them to participate in these controversies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Veterinarians’ Discourses on Animals and Clients.Gjalt de Graaf - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (6):557-578.
Animal ethics for veterinarians.Andrew Linzey (ed.) - 2017 - Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Strong Patient Advocacy and the Fundamental Ethical Role of Veterinarians.Simon Coghlan - 2018 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (3):349-367.
Veterinary Ethics.Jerrold Tannenbaum - 2019 - In . Wiley. pp. 1-14.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-30

Downloads
17 (#863,251)

6 months
9 (#438,283)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2004 - Univ of California Press.
The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten.Immanuel Kant - 1785 - Stuttgart,: P. Reclam. Edited by Theodor Valentiner.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - Human Studies 8 (4):389-392.

View all 13 references / Add more references