- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why Posterity Matters: Environmental Policies and Future Generations
Routledge (1994)
Abstract
The first comprehensive philosophical examination of our duties to future generations, Dr de-Shalit argues that they are a matter of justice, not charity or supererogationAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Why Posterity Matters: Environmental Policies and Future Generations.Avner De-Shalit - 1994 - Routledge.
Why Posterity Matters: Environmental Policies and Future Generations.Avner De-Shalit - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (186):130-132.
Thinking for Tomorrow: reflections on Avner de-Shalit.Peter Marshall - 1993 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 10 (1):105-113.
Review of deShalit (de-Shalit), Avner, The Environment between Theory and Practice. [REVIEW]Matthew Humphrey - 2003 - Environmental Values 12:134-136.
Environmental Policies and Justice Between Generations.Avner De Shalit - 2006 - European Journal of Political Research 21:307-316.
Review of: Light, Andrew, and de-Shalit, Avner, eds., Moral and Political Reasoning in Environmental Practice. [REVIEW]Markku Oksanen - 2005 - Environmental Values 14 (2):271-274.
Review of Jonathan Wolff, Avner de-shalit, Disadvantage. [REVIEW]Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (2).
The Rights of Future Generations.Wilfred Beckerman & Joanna Pasek - 2001 - In Wilfred Beckerman & Joanna Pasek (eds.), Justice, Posterity, and the Environment. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-12-06
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2015-12-06
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The only ethical argument for positive δ? Partiality and pure time preference.Andreas Mogensen - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (9):2731-2750.
Harming as causing harm.Elizabeth Harman - 2009 - In David Wasserman & Melinda Roberts (eds.), Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem. Springer. pp. 137--154.
Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering: The Question of Justice.Toby Svoboda, Klaus Keller, Marlos Goes & Nancy Tuana - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (3):157-180.
Climate change, intergenerational equity and the social discount rate.Simon Caney - 2014 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (4):320-342.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-xdvnm uwo