The only ethical argument for positive δ? Partiality and pure time preference

Philosophical Studies 179 (9):2731-2750 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I consider the plausibility of discounting for kinship, the view that a positive rate of pure intergenerational time preference is justifiable in terms of agent-relative moral reasons relating to partiality between generations. I respond to Parfit's objections to discounting for kinship, but then highlight a number of apparent limitations of this approach. I show that these limitations largely fall away when we reflect on social discounting in the context of decisions that concern the global community as a whole, such as those related to global climate change.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,836

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-02-05

Downloads
96 (#230,531)

6 months
22 (#137,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andreas Mogensen
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Carbon Tax Ethics.Kian Mintz-Woo - 2024 - WIREs Climate Change 15 (1):e858.
Economic inequality and the long-term future.Andreas T. Schmidt & Daan Juijn - 2024 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 23 (1):67-99.
Economic inequality and the long-term future.Andreas T. Schmidt & Daan Juijn - 2023 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics (1):67-99.
The Case for Animal-Inclusive Longtermism.Gary David O’Brien - forthcoming - Journal of Moral Philosophy:1-24.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations