28 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Lukas H. Meyer [19]Lukas Meyer [16]
  1. Intergenerational Justice.Lukas Meyer - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Is it fair to leave the next generation a public debt? Is it defensible to impose legal rules on them through constitutional constraints? From combating climate change to ensuring proper funding for future pensions, concerns about ethics between generations are everywhere. In this volume sixteen philosophers explore intergenerational justice. Part One examines the ways in which various theories of justice look at the matter. These include libertarian, Rawlsian, sufficientarian, contractarian, communitarian, Marxian and reciprocity-based approaches. In Part Two, the authors look (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations  
  2. Intergenerational Justice.Axel Gosseries & Lukas H. Meyer - 2009 - Oxford, Royaume-Uni: Oxford University Press.
    Is it fair to leave the next generation a public debt? Is it defensible to impose legal rules on them through constitutional constraints? From combating climate change to ensuring proper funding for future pensions, concerns about ethics between generations are everywhere. In this volume sixteen philosophers explore intergenerational justice. Part One examines the ways in which various theories of justice look at the matter. These include libertarian, Rawlsian, sufficientarian, contractarian, communitarian, Marxian and reciprocity-based approaches. In Part Two, the authors look (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  3. Enough for the Future.Lukas H. Meyer & Dominic Roser - 2009 - In Axel Gosseries & Lukas H. Meyer (eds.), Intergenerational Justice. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  4. Climate Justice and Historical Emissions.Lukas H. Meyer & Dominic Roser - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1):229-253.
    Climate change can be interpreted as a unique case of historical injustice involving issues of both intergenerational and global justice. We split the issue into two separate questions. First, how should emission rights be distributed? Second, who should come up for the costs of coping with climate change? We regard the first question as being an issue of pure distributive justice and argue on prioritarian grounds that the developing world should receive higher per capita emission rights than the developed world. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  5. The Ethical Challenges in the Context of Climate Loss and Damage.Ivo Wallimann-Helmer, Kian Mintz-Woo, Lukas Meyer, Thomas Schinko & Olivia Serdeczny - 2019 - In Reinhard Mechler, Laurens M. Bouwer, Thomas Schinko, Swenja Surminski & JoAnne Linnerooth-Bayer (eds.), Loss and Damage from Climate Change. Cham: Springer. pp. 39-62.
    This chapter lays out what we take to be the main types of justice and ethical challenges concerning those adverse effects of climate change leading to climate-related Loss and Damage (L&D). We argue that it is essential to clearly differentiate between the challenges concerning mitigation and adaptation and those ethical issues exclusively relevant for L&D in order to address the ethical aspects pertaining to L&D in international climate policy. First, we show that depending on how mitigation and adaptation are distinguished (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6.  34
    Climate Justice and Historical Emissions.Lukas H. Meyer & Pranay Sanklecha - 2017 - Cambridge University Press.
    This book provides a systematic introduction to the debate on historical emissions and climate change, for students, researchers and policymakers.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  7.  34
    Introduction - Intergenerational Justice and Its Challenges.Axel Gosseries & Lukas Meyer - 2009 - In Axel Gosseries & Lukas Meyer (eds.), Intergenerational Justice. Oxford University Press.
    This Introduction tells the story of intergerational justice and how it has influenced philosophers and political thinkers throughout history. The Introduction goes on to discuss the aims of the book, which is to offer a sustained discussion of intergenerational justice as seen by practical philosophers. The first part of the book focuses on the way in which various schools of thought in moral and political philosophy approach the domain of intergenerational justice, while the second part focuses on more specific aspects, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  8. Past and Future.Lukas Meyer - 2003 - In Lukas H. Meyer, Stanley L. Paulson & Thomas W. Pogge (eds.), Rights, Culture and the Law: Themes From the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  9.  40
    How Legitimate Expectations Matter in Climate Justice.Lukas H. Meyer & Pranay Sanklecha - 2014 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (4):369-393.
    Expectations play an important role in how people plan their lives and pursue their projects. People living in highly industrialized countries share a way of life that comes with high levels of emissions. Their expectations to be able to continue their projects imply their holding expectations to similarly high future levels of personal emissions. We argue that the frustration or undermining of these expectations would cause them significant harm. Further, the article investigates under what conditions people can be thought to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  10. Basic Needs and Sufficiency: The Foundations of Intergenerational Justice.Lukas Meyer & Thomas Pölzler - forthcoming - In Stephen M. Gardiner (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Intergenerational Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    This paper addresses a theory of intergenerational justice that we refer to as “needs-based sufficientarianism”. According to needs-based sufficientarianism, the present generation ought to enable future generations to meet their basic needs — for example, their needs for drinkable water, food and health care. Our aim is to explain and defend this theory in a programmatic way. First, we introduce what we regard as the most plausible variant of needs-based sufficientarianism. Then we argue that this variant is superior to several (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  1
    Superseding Historical Injustice? New Critical Assessments.Lukas H. Meyer & Timothy Waligore - 2022 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25 (3):319-330.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  84
    Natural Hazards and the Normative Significance of Expectations in Protecting Alpine Communities.Thomas Pölzler, Florian Ortner, Oliver Sass & Lukas Meyer - 2017 - Geophysical Research Abstracts: Abstracts of the European Geosciences Union General Assembly.
  13.  39
    The Timing of Benefits of Climate Policies. Reconsidering the Opportunity Cost Argument.Lukas H. Meyer & Dominic Roser - 2012 - Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft Und Ethik 16 (1):179-214.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik Jahrgang: 16 Heft: 1 Seiten: 179-214.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  14.  67
    Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes From the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz.Lukas H. Meyer, Stanley L. Paulson & Thomas Winfried Menko Pogge (eds.) - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
    The volume brings together a collection of original papers on some of the main tenets of Joseph Raz's legal and political philosophy: Legal positivism and the nature of law, practical reason, authority, the value of equality, incommensurability, harm, group rights, and multiculturalism.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  15.  24
    Historical Injustice and the Right of Return.Lukas H. Meyer - 2004 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 5 (2):305-316.
    There are two main sources of theoretical doubt regarding the validity of claims for reparation: the questions arising from the non-identity problem and those arising from the supersession thesis. Neither of them significantly undermines the Palestinian refugees’ claims to reparations and a right of return.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  16.  12
    Democracy for the Future: A Conceptual Framework to Assess Institutional Reform.Ivo Wallimann-Helmer, Lukas Meyer & Paul Burger - 2017 - Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft Und Ethik 21 (1):197-220.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik Jahrgang: 21 Heft: 1 Seiten: 197-220.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17.  39
    Reparations and Symbolic Restitution.Lukas H. Meyer - 2006 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (3):406–422.
  18.  12
    9. Die Grundstruktur als institutionelle Ausprägung von John Rawlsʼ Gerechtigkeit als Fairness.Lukas H. Meyer - 2015 - In Otfried Höffe (ed.), John Rawls: Politischer Liberalismus. De Gruyter. pp. 147-162.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19. The Rights of Future People and Claims to Compensation Owing to Wrongless Harm-Doing By Previous Generations.Lukas H. Meyer - forthcoming - Ethical Perspectives.
  20.  4
    Legitimacy, Justice and Public International Law.Lukas H. Meyer (ed.) - 2009 - Cambridge Univeristy Press.
    Do states or individuals stand under duties of international justice to people who live elsewhere and to other states? How are we to assess the legitimacy of international institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and the United Nations Security Council? Should we support reforms of international institutions and how should we go about assessing alternative proposals of such reforms? The book brings together leading scholars of public international law, jurisprudence and international relations, political philosophers and political theorists to explore (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  21.  18
    Obligations persistantes et réparation symbolique.Lukas H. Meyer - 2003 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 101 (1):105-122.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  22.  29
    Introduction: Democracy, Equality, and Justice.Matt Matravers & Lukas Meyer - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1):1-15.
  23.  23
    Introduction to the Special Issue on Legitimate Expectations.Lukas Meyer, Thomas Pölzler & Pranay Sanklecha - 2017 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 4 (2):173-175.
    In this short introduction, we will briefly sketch some central features of the problem of legitimate expectations and then lead over to the papers of our special issue.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. Entry on “Intergenerational Justice.”.Lukas Meyer - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  25.  28
    Brian Barry: 1936–2009.Matt Matravers & Lukas Meyer - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1):255-257.
  26.  12
    Symposium: Intergenerational Justice and Natural Resources: Introduction.Alexa Zellentin, Pranay Sanklecha & Lukas Meyer - 2015 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 2 (1):1-5.
  27. Éthique et mort(s) - Obligations persistantes et réparation symbolique.Lukas H. Meyer - 2003 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 101 (1):105-122.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  10
    Nach dem Recht auf Rückkehr.Lukas H. Meyer - 2006 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 54 (4):623-639.
    Die Geltung von Entschädigungsansprüchen für historisches Unrecht wird in der philosophischen Literatur vor allem aus zwei Gründen bestritten: auf Grund des Nichtidentitätsproblems und auf Grund der von Jeremy Waldron behaupteten möglichen Aufhebung historischen Unrechts durch die Veränderung von Umständen. Für die Beurteilung des Rechts der palästinensischen Flüchtlinge auf Rückkehr sind beide Einwände nur von geringer Bedeutung. Die Palästinenser sollten jedoch auf ihr Recht auf Rückkehr vorläufig verzichten , um einen Kompromiss zu ermöglichen, der es ihnen erlaubte, ihr Selbstbestimmungsrecht in einem (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark