Abstract rationality has increasingly been a target of attack in contemporary educational research and practice and in its place practical reason and situated thinking have become a focus of interest. The argument here is that something is lost in this. In illustrating how we might think about the issue, this paper makes a response to the charge that as a result of his commitment to the ‘Enlightenment project’ Vygotsky holds abstract rationality as the pinnacle of thought. Against this it is argued that Vygotsky had a far more sophisticated appreciation of reason and of its remit. The paper proceeds first by examining the picture of Vygotsky that is presented in the work of James Wertsch, and especially his claim that Vygotsky was an ambivalent rationalist, goes on to provide an account of Vygotsky that corrects this picture, and develops this in the light of the work of Robert Brandom, who shares Vygotsky’s inheritance of Hegel. The conclusion towards which this piece points is that the philosophical underpinnings of Vygotsky’s work provide a radically different idea of rationality and epistemology from that characterised as abstract rationality and that this has significance for education studies.
Keywords Abstract rationality  Concepts  Vygotsky  Brandom  Hegel
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11217-007-9047-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,908
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mind and World.John Mcdowell - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (182):99-109.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Problem for Cognitive Load Theory—the Distinctively Human Life‐Form.Jan Derry - 2020 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 54 (1):5-22.
From Disembodied Intellect to Cultivated Rationality.Jan Derry - 2016 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 50 (1):117-122.
Bringing Inferentialism to Science Education.Edward Causton - 2019 - Science & Education 28 (1-2):25-43.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reconstruction and Pragmatist Metaphysics. On Brandom’s Understanding of Rationality.Italo Testa - 2012 - Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 41 (1-3):175-201.
Brandom's Reconstructive Rationality. Some Pragmatist Themes.Italo Testa - 2009 - Towards an Analytic Pragmatism. Workshop on Bob Brandom's Recent Philosophy of Language.
Versions of Vygotsky.Julia Gillen - 2000 - British Journal of Educational Studies 48 (2):183 - 198.
On Emotion and Rationality: A Response to Barrett.Ellis Van Dam & Jan Steutel - 1996 - Journal of Moral Education 25 (4):395-400.
Brandom’s Demarcation of Logic.John Macfarlane - 2008 - Philosophical Topics 36 (2):55-62.
Dewey's Dynamic Integration of Vygotsky and Piaget.Susan J. Mayer - 2008 - Education and Culture 24 (2):pp. 6-24.


Added to PP index

Total views
158 ( #72,838 of 2,497,711 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #283,634 of 2,497,711 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes