University of Chicago Press (1992)
AbstractIn the seventeenth century, a vision arose which was to captivate the Western imagination for the next three hundred years: the vision of Cosmopolis, a society as rationally ordered as the Newtonian view of nature. While fueling extraordinary advances in all fields of human endeavor, this vision perpetuated a hidden yet persistent agenda: the delusion that human nature and society could be fitted into precise and manageable rational categories. Stephen Toulmin confronts that agenda—its illusions and its consequences for our present and future world. "By showing how different the last three centuries would have been if Montaigne, rather than Descartes, had been taken as a starting point, Toulmin helps destroy the illusion that the Cartesian quest for certainty is intrinsic to the nature of science or philosophy."—Richard M. Rorty, University of Virginia "[Toulmin] has now tackled perhaps his most ambitious theme of all.... His aim is nothing less than to lay before us an account of both the origins and the prospects of our distinctively modern world. By charting the evolution of modernity, he hopes to show us what intellectual posture we ought to adopt as we confront the coming millennium."—Quentin Skinner, New York Review of Books.
Similar books and articles
Stephen Toulmin, Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. [REVIEW]Ronald de Sousa - 1991 - Philosophy in Review 11:138-139.
Stephen Toulmin, Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity Reviewed by.Ronald de Sousa - 1991 - Philosophy in Review 11 (2):138-139.
Toulmin, Stephen: Cosmopolis. The Hidden Agenda Of Modernity. , Xii + 228 Pp. [REVIEW]António Martins - 1992 - Revista Filosófica de Coimbra 1 (1):197-198.
Cosmopolis: The hidden agenda of modernity.Brian Barry - 1996 - History of European Ideas 22 (1):57-58.
Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity: Critical Essays on the Philosophical Discourse of Modernity.Maurizio Passerin D'Entrèves & Seyla Benhabib (eds.) - 1997 - MIT Press.
Da zhuan xiang: wu xing lun yu yi duan niu zhuan wen ming de li shi = The swerve: how the world became modern.Stephen Greenblatt - 2014 - Taibei Shi: Mao tou ying chu ban.
Reviews. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 1995 - Philosophical Investigations 18 (1):74-96.
After Modernity: Archaeological Approaches to the Contemporary Past.Rodney Harrison - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
Dialectical Pyrrhonism: Montaigne, Sextus Empiricus, and the Self-Overcoming of Philosophy.Roger Eichorn - 2022 - Sképsis: Revista de Filosofia 24 (13):24-46.
Science Transformed?: Debating Claims of an Epochal Break.Alfred Nordmann, Hans Radder & Gregor Schiemann (eds.) - 2011 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Multiple Levels of Analysis and the Limitations of Methodological Individualisms.Ronald Jepperson & John W. Meyer - 2011 - Sociological Theory 29 (1):54 - 73.
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Amsterdam (Netherlands): pp. 769-777.
From Fleck's denkstil to Kuhn's paradigm: Conceptual schemes and incommensurability.Babette E. Babich - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):75 – 92.
References found in this work
No references found.