Philosophical Topics 36 (2):55-62 (2008)

John MacFarlane
University of California, Berkeley
This is a lightly edited version of my comments on Brandom’s Lecture 2, as delivered in Prague at the “Prague Locke Lectures” in April, 2007. I try to say why Brandom’s proposed demarcation is significant, by placing it in a broader context of demarcation proposals from Kant to the twentieth century. I then raise some questions about the basic ingredients of Brandom’s demarcation—the notions of PP-sufficiency and VP-sufficiency—and question whether the vocabulary of conditionals, Brandom’s paradigm for logical vocabulary, can be universal-LX.
Keywords logic  inferentialism  Brandom
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0276-2080
DOI 10.5840/philtopics200836218
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,512
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Logical Constants as Punctuation Marks.Kosta Došen - 1989 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 30 (3):362-381.
The Province of Logic.William Kneale - 1956 - Mind 66 (262):258.
Logic Without Assumptions.K. R. Popper - 1948 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 13 (2):114-115.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
181 ( #65,940 of 2,520,900 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,180 of 2,520,900 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes