Ancient rites and new laws: how should we regulate religious circumcision of minors?

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (7):456-458 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ancient practice of metzitzah b'peh, direct oral suction, is still practiced by ultra-Orthodox Jews as part of the religious rite of male newborn circumcision. Between 2000 and 2011, 11 children have died in New York and New Jersey, following infection by herpes simplex virus, presumably from infected practitioners. The City responded by requiring signed parental consent before oral suction, with parents being warned of the dangers of the practice. This essay argues that informed consent is not an appropriate response to this problem. An outright ban would a better response to a practice that is dangerous to children, but might prove unconstitutional under New York State law

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Routine neonatal circumcision: Symbol of the birth of the therapeutic state.Thomas Szasz - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):137-148.
Criticising religious practices.Brian D. Earp - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 63:15-17.
Parents, Adolescents, and Consent for Research Participation.A. S. Iltis - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (3):332-346.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
30 (#529,972)

6 months
7 (#419,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references