Religious circumcision, invasive rites, neutrality and equality: bearing the burdens and consequences of belief

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (7):450-455 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The decision of the German regional court in Cologne on 26 June 2012 to prohibit the circumcision of minors is important insofar as it recognises the qualitative similarities between the practice and other prohibited invasive rites, such as female genital cutting. However, recognition of similarity poses serious questions with regard to liberal public policy, specifically with regard to the exceptionalist treatment demanded by certain circumcising groups. In this paper, I seek to advance egalitarian means of dealing with invasive rites which take seriously cultural diversity, minimise harm and place responsibility for the burdens and consequences of beliefs upon those who promote practices

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Forced circumcision of men.Michael Glass - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (8):567-571.
Criticising religious practices.Brian D. Earp - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 63:15-17.
African Rites of Passage.Charles Serei - 1972 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 47 (2):281-294.
Barry and Kukathas as Inspiring Sources for a Fair Church-State System in Belgium.Leni Franken & Patrick Loobuyck - 2011 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 10 (28):3-20.
Routine neonatal circumcision: Symbol of the birth of the therapeutic state.Thomas Szasz - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):137-148.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
28 (#524,295)

6 months
2 (#1,015,942)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?