- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Communicating Popular Science: From Deficit to Democracy
[author unknown]
(2013)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Sarah Tinker Perrault, Communicating Popular Science: From Deficit to Democracy. [REVIEW]Yiqiong Zhang - 2015 - Discourse Studies 17 (4):501-502.
Deficit of democracy or democratic deficit? Transition to, in and from democracy in Europe.Nikolas H. M. Roos - 2002 - Rechtstheorie 33 (2-4):247-281.
Institutionalizing Agonistic Democracy: Post-Foundationalism and Political Liberalism.Edward C. Wingenbach - 2011 - Ashgate.
Science for Democracy: Communicating Science for Knowledge Equity.David D. Kumar - 1990 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 10 (5-6):290-292.
Ethical issues in communicating science.Professor Jinnie M. Garreu & Stephanie J. Bird - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):435-442.
Communicating Science: Professional, Popular, Literary. [REVIEW]Alan Gross - 2010 - Isis 101:926-927.
Commentary on Ben Berger’s Attention Deficit Democracy.Andrew F. Smith - 2013 - Social Philosophy Today 29:153-158.
Commentary on Ben Berger’s Attention Deficit Democracy.Andrew F. Smith - 2013 - Social Philosophy Today 29:153-158.
The golem: Uncertainty and communicating science. [REVIEW]Professor Trevor Pinch - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):511-523.
Nicholas Russell. Communicating Science: Professional, Popular, Literary. xxiv + 324 pp., index. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. $31.99. [REVIEW]Alan Gross - 2010 - Isis 101 (4):926-927.
The golem: Uncertainty and communicating science.Trevor Pinch - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):511-523.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-11-26
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2020-11-26
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
Communicating environmental science beyond academia: Stylistic patterns of newsworthiness in popular science journalism.Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska - 2017 - Discourse and Communication 11 (1):69-88.
Nanoethics, Science Communication, and a Fourth Model for Public Engagement.Andy Miah - 2017 - NanoEthics 11 (2):139-152.
El problema del déficit en los modelos democráticos de divulgación científica.Jorge M. Escobar - 2017 - Arbor 193 (785):407.
On the Coercive Nature of Research Impact Metrics: The Case Study of Altmetrics and Science Communication.Luis Arboledas-Lérida - 2021 - Social Epistemology 35 (5):461-474.
How experts understand the public in vaccination controversies in Chile.Verónica Rocamora Villena, René Jara Reyes & Claudio Broitman Rojas - 2019 - Arbor 195 (794):530.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c88c7cdf7-qczmr uwo