Nanoethics, Science Communication, and a Fourth Model for Public Engagement

NanoEthics 11 (2):139-152 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper develops a fourth model of public engagement with science, grounded in the principle of nurturing scientific agency through participatory bioethics. It argues that social media is an effective device through which to enable such engagement, as it has the capacity to empower users and transforms audiences into co-producers of knowledge, rather than consumers of content. Social media also fosters greater engagement with the political and legal implications of science, thus promoting the value of scientific citizenship. This argument is explored by considering the case of nanoscience and nanotechnology, as an exemplar for how emerging technologies may be handled by the scientific community and science policymakers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The laboratory revisited.Robert Doubleday - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (2):167-176.
Taking Our Own Medicine: On an Experiment in Science Communication.Maja Horst - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):801-815.
The Challenges of Community Engagement.Craig Cormick - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (3):229-231.
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science.Rinie Est - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
Review of Nanoethics. [REVIEW]Jason Robert - 2008 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 2 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-04

Downloads
23 (#701,793)

6 months
6 (#582,229)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?