The Ever-Evolving Concept of Clinical Significance and the Potential for Sins of Omission in Genetic Research

&
American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):22-24 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 10, Page 22-24, October 2012

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2012.699142

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Sins of Omission? The Non-Treatment of Controls in Clinical Trials.Michael Lockwood & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1983 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 57 (1):207 - 227.
A New Justification for Pediatric Research Without the Potential for Clinical Benefit.David Wendler - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (1):23 - 31.
The nature and significance of behavioural genetic information.Ainsley Newson - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (2):89-111.
Disclosing Individual Genetic Research Results to Deceased Participants' Relatives by Means of a Qualified Disclosure Policy.Annelien L. Bredenoord & Johannes Jm van Delden - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):10-12.
Beneficence, Clinical Urgency, and the Return of Individual Research Results to Relatives.Stephanie M. Fullerton, Susan Brown Trinidad, Gail P. Jarvik & Wylie Burke - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):9-10.
Clinical Ethics and Patient Satisfaction: The Practical Significance of Distinguishing Ethics and Morals.David C. Landy, Kenneth W. Goodman & Jeffrey P. Brosco - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (5):20-22.
What is genetic information, and why is it significant? A contextual, contrastive, approach.Neil C. Manson - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):1–16.
Gibsonian sins of omission.John Heil - 1981 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11 (3):307–311.
Genetic assimilation and a possible evolutionary paradox: can macroevolution sometimes be so fast to pass us by?Massimo Pigliucci - 2003 - Evolution 57 (7):1455-1464.
On Justifying Pediatric Research Without the Prospect of Clinical Benefit.Loretta M. Kopelman - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (1):32 - 34.
Why Even Inappropriate Parental Consent Might Be Enough to Justify Minimal Risk Pediatric Research Without Clinical Benefit.David Hunter - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (1):35 - 36.
The Context of Clinical Research and Its Ethical Relevance: The COMPAS Trial as a Case Study.Silvia Camporesi & Matteo Mameli - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (1):39 - 40.
Wanted: Human Biospecimens.Karen J. Maschke - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (5):21-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-14

Downloads
26 (#606,277)

6 months
7 (#419,635)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Return of Results of Deceased Research Participants.Anne Marie Tassé - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):621-630.
The Return of Results of Deceased Research Participants.Anne Marie Tassé - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):621-630.

Add more references