The nature and significance of behavioural genetic information
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (2):89-111 (2004)
Abstract
In light of the human genome project, establishing the genetic aetiology of complex human diseases has become a research priority within Western medicine. However, in addition to the identification of disease genes, numerous research projects are also being undertaken to identify genes contributing to the development of human behavioural characteristics, such as cognitive ability and criminal tendency. The permissibility of this research is obviously controversial: will society benefit from this research, or will it adversely affect our conceptions of ourselves and each other? When assessing the permissibility of this research, it is important to consider the nature and deterministic significance of behavioural genetic information. Whilst todate there has been much discussion and debate about the properties of genetic information per se and genetic determinism, this has not been applied to behavioural genetic research and its ethical implications. Therefore, this paper elucidates how behavioural genetic information can be distinguished from other types of genetic and non-genetic information and also synthesises the determinative significance of genetic factors for the development of human behavioural traits. Undertaking this analysis enables the ethical issues raised by this research to be debated in an appropriate context and indicates that separate policy considerations are warranted.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1023/b:meta.0000033764.50604.85
My notes
Similar books and articles
Are genetic self-tests dangerous? Assessing the commercialization of genetic testing in terms of personal autonomy.Ludvig Beckman - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (5-6):387-398.
Genetic information: Important but not “exceptional”. [REVIEW]Ruth Hannah Wilkinson - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):457-472.
Property rights in genetic information.Richard A. Spinello - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):29-42.
The use of genetic test information in insurance: The argument from indistinguishability reconsidered.V. Launis - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):299-310.
‘It could just be an additional test couldn’t it?’:genetic testing for susceptibility to aggression and violence.Mairi Levitt & Elisa Pieri - 2009 - .
What is genetic information, and why is it significant? A contextual, contrastive, approach.Neil C. Manson - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):1–16.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
61 (#196,802)
6 months
1 (#450,425)
2009-01-28
Downloads
61 (#196,802)
6 months
1 (#450,425)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Communication of genetic information within families: The case for familial comity. [REVIEW]Angela Davey, Ainsley Newson & Peter O’Leary - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3):161-166.
References found in this work
What is the developmentalist challenge?Paul E. Griffiths & Robin D. Knight - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (2):253-258.
Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies.Laura M. Purdy - 1996 - Ethics 106 (2):474-476.
Genes, behavior, and developmental emergentism: One process, indivisible?Kenneth F. Schaffner - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (2):209-252.
How distinctive is genetic information?M. Richards - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (4):663-687.
The question not asked: The challenge of pleiotropic genetic tests.Robert Samuel Wachbroit - 1998 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):131-144.