Ben Chan, Flavia M. Facio, Haley Eidem, Sara Chandros Hull, Leslie G. Biesecker & Benjamin E. Berkman
American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):1-8 (2012)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Whole-genome analysis and whole-exome analysis generate many more clinically actionable findings than traditional targeted genetic analysis. These findings may be relevant to research participants themselves as well as for members of their families. Though researchers performing genomic analyses are likely to find medically significant genetic variations for nearly every research participant, what they will find for any given participant is unpredictable. The ubiquity and diversity of these findings complicate questions about disclosing individual genetic test results. We outline an approach for disclosing a select range of genetic results to the relatives of research participants who have died, developed in response to relatives? requests during a pilot study of large-scale medical genetic sequencing. We also argue that studies that disclose individual research results to participants should, at a minimum, passively disclose individual results to deceased participants? relatives
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1080/15265161.2012.699138 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):8 – 17.
Citations of this work BETA
What Does the Duty to Warn Require?Seema K. Shah, Sara Chandros Hull, Michael A. Spinner, Benjamin E. Berkman, Lauren A. Sanchez, Ruquyyah Abdul-Karim, Amy P. Hsu, Reginald Claypool & Steven M. Holland - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (10):62 - 63.
Consent to Epistemic Interventions: A Contribution to the Debate on the Right (Not) to Know.Niels Nijsingh - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (1):103-110.
Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences.Deborah R. Gordon, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Marguerite Robinson, Wesley O. Petersen, Jason S. Egginton, Kari G. Chaffee, Gloria M. Petersen, Susan M. Wolf & Barbara A. Koenig - 2019 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 10 (1):1-22.
Health Data Research on Sudden Cardiac Arrest: Perspectives of Survivors and Their Next-of-Kin.Dick L. Willems, Hanno L. Tan, Marieke T. Blom, Rens Veeken & Marieke A. R. Bak - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-15.
Disclosing Individual Genetic Research Results to Deceased Participants' Relatives by Means of a Qualified Disclosure Policy.Annelien L. Bredenoord & Johannes Jm van Delden - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):10-12.
View all 17 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Genomic Inheritances: Disclosing Individual Research Results From Whole-Exome Sequencing to Deceased Participants' Relatives”.Sara Chandros Hull, Ben Chan, Leslie G. Biesecker & Benjamin E. Berkman - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):W9-W10.
The Return of Results of Deceased Research Participants.Anne Marie Tassé - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):621-630.
Undesirable Implications of Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants.Leslie Meltzer Henry - unknown
Disclosing Individual Genetic Research Results to Deceased Participants' Relatives by Means of a Qualified Disclosure Policy.Annelien L. Bredenoord & Johannes Jm van Delden - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):10-12.
Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):8 – 17.
Familial Communication of Research Results: A Need to Know?Lee Black & Kelly A. McClellan - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):605-613.
Undesirable Implications of Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants.Leslie A. Meltzer - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):28 – 30.
Taking Our Obligations to Research Participants Seriously: Disclosing Individual Results of Genetic Research.Teri A. Manolio - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):32 – 34.
Use of Next Generation Sequencing Technologies in Research and Beyond: Are Participants with Mental Health Disorders Fully Protected? [REVIEW]Groisman Iris Jaitovich, Mathieu Ghislaine & Godard Beatrice - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):36-.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants”: Defining Clinical Utility And Revisiting the Role of Relationships.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):W10-W12.
Disclosure of Research Result to Research Participants: Needs and Attitudes of Adolescents and Parents.Conrad Vincent Fernandez, Shaureen Taweel, Eric D. Kodish & Charles Weijer - unknown
Participants' Perceptions of Research Benefits in an African Genetic Epidemiology Study.John Appiah-Poku, Sam Newton & Nancy Kass - 2011 - Developing World Bioethics 11 (3):128-135.
Return of Research Results: General Principles and International Perspectives.Emmanuelle Lévesque, Yann Joly & Jacques Simard - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):583-592.
Public Expectations for Return of Results From Large-Cohort Genetic Research.Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy & Kathy Hudson - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):36 – 43.
Pediatric Research and the Return of Individual Research Results.Denise Avard, Karine Sénécal, Parvaz Madadi & Daniel Sinnett - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):593-604.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-09-14
Total views
32 ( #358,639 of 2,517,922 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,045 of 2,517,922 )
2012-09-14
Total views
32 ( #358,639 of 2,517,922 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,045 of 2,517,922 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads