Why Even Inappropriate Parental Consent Might Be Enough to Justify Minimal Risk Pediatric Research Without Clinical Benefit

American Journal of Bioethics 12 (1):35 - 36 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 1, Page 35-36, January 2012

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consent to Pediatric Research: A Couple of Distinctions.Carlo Petrini - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (1):37 - 38.
Justifying Pediatric Research Not Expected to Benefit Child Subjects.Merle Spriggs - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (1):42 - 44.
Neonatal euthanasia: Why require parental consent? [REVIEW]Jacob M. Appel - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (4):477-482.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-07

Downloads
25 (#542,984)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Hunter
University of Adelaide

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
The Elements of Moral Philosophy.James Rachels & Stuart Rachels - 1986 - [Dubuque]: Random House (NY). Edited by James Rachels.
Research Exceptionalism.James Wilson & David Hunter - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (8):45-54.

View all 7 references / Add more references