Análisis Filosófico 40 (2):213-246 (2020)

Authors
Abstract
In texts such as “Richard Rorty’s Pragmatic Turn” Jürgen Habermas defends a theory that associates, on the one hand, the truth-claim raised by a speaker for a proposition p with, on the other hand, the requirement that p be “defendable on the basis of good reasons […] at any time and against anybody”. This, as is known, has been the target of criticisms by Rorty, who−in spite of agreeing with Habermas on the central tenet that the way of evaluating our beliefs must be argumentative practice−declares that the only “ideal presupposed by discourse” is “that of being able to justify your beliefs to a competent audience”. We will consider two texts from 1971, -surprisingly neglected in most approaches to the debate-, in which Habermas did include such a “competence condition” to elucidate the notion of truth. We will discuss whether there are good reasons to relinquish such a condition and to refer, instead, only to the formal or procedural properties of argumentative exchanges, as Habermas does in presenting the notion of “ideal speech situation”. As we will try to argue, there are no such good reasons.
Keywords Rorty, Richard  Habermas, Jürgen  universalism  ethnocentrism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.36446/af.2020.368
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Solidarity or Objectivity?Richard Rorty - 2011 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin (eds.), The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present. Princeton University Press. pp. 367-380.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

“Habermas, Rorty y la relación entre la verdad y la justificación”.Pilar Salvá Soria - 2017 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 50:229-243.
Neopragmatismo E Verdade: Rorty Em Conversação Com Habermas.Paulo Ghiraldelli Jr - 2005 - Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 10 (29):67-78.
El filósofo y formador del lenguaje.Jürgen Habermas - 2008 - Ideas Y Valores 57 (138):5-16.
La experiencia estética como género supremo del conocimiento.Andrés López Molina - 1989 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 23:149-166.
Trabajo e interacción como intereses rectores del conocimiento.Andrés López Molina - 1994 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 28:103-120.
La crisis de la teoría del conocimiento en las «fases abandonadas de la reflexión». Interpretación habermasiana.Andrés López Molina - 1987 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 22 (13):153-184.
A Verdade E Seu Contexto: Uma Abordagem A Partir De Habermas E Rorty.Magnus Dagios - 2009 - Cadernos de Ética E Filosofia Política 14:25-46.
Conocimiento y verdad: pragmatismo, contextualismo y solución epistémica.Antonio M. López Molina - 2010 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 43:251-273.
Is Habermas a Transcendental Thinker?Michael Cloete - 2000 - South African Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):95-117.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-12-09

Total views
137 ( #80,366 of 2,462,048 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #35,164 of 2,462,048 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes