- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Debating the State of Philosophy: Habermas, Rorty, and Kołakowski
Józef Niznik & John T. Sanders (eds.)
Westport, Conn.: Praeger (1996)
Abstract
This book consists of the edited proceedings of a debate among Jurgen Habermas, Richard Rorty, and Leszek Kolakowski that was held in Warsaw in May of 1995. It includes also commentary from those in attendance, including extensive remarks by Ernest Gellner. The debate marked the fortieth anniversary of the foundation of the Institute of Philosophy and Sociology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, and focussed primarily on topics related to historicism and cultural relativism.Author Profiles
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Comments on the Habermas/Rorty Debate.John T. Sanders - 1996 - In Józef Niznik & John T. Sanders (eds.), Debating the State of Philosophy: Habermas, Rorty, and Kolakowski. Praeger.
Comments on Philosophy and the Dilemmas of the Contemporary World.John T. Sanders - 1996 - In Józef Niznik & John T. Sanders (eds.), Debating the State of Philosophy: Habermas, Rorty, and Kolakowski. Praeger.
Clearing the Decks:Main Currents of Marxism: Vol. 1, The Founders. Leszek Kolakowski; Main Currents of Marxism: Vol. 2, The Golden Age. Leszek Kolakowski; Main Currents of Marxism: Vol. 3, The Breakdown. Leszek Kolakowski. [REVIEW]Jon Elster - 1981 - Ethics 91 (4):634-.
The Marxism that Failed:Main Currents of Marxism: Vol. 1, The Founders. Leszek Kolakowski; Main Currents of Marxism: Vol. 2, The Golden Age. Leszek Kolakowski; Main Currents of Marxism: Vol. 3, The Breakdown. Leszek Kolakowski. [REVIEW]Andrew Levine - 1981 - Ethics 91 (4):645-.
God owes us nothing: a brief remark on Pascal's religion and on the spirit of Jansenism.Leszek Kołakowski - 1995 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Truth and Progress: Volume 3: Philosophical Papers (Philosophical Papers (Cambridge)).Richard Rorty - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
Review of Jurgen Habermas (edited and translated by Barbara Fultner), Truth and Justification. [REVIEW]Richard Rorty - 2003 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (12).
A moment of unconditional validity? Schutz and the habermas/rorty debate.Michael D. Barber - 2004 - Human Studies 27 (1):51-67.
Richard Rorty's philosophical legacy.Steve Fuller - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (1):121-132.
„... And to define America, her athletic democracy“. Im Andenken an Richard Rorty, den Philosophen, Schriftsteller und politischen Intellektuellen.Jürgen Habermas - 2007 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 55 (6):851-858.
Why is there something rather than nothing?: 23 questions from great philosophers.Leszek Kolakowski - 2007 - New York: Basic Books. Edited by Agnieszka Kołakowska.
Rorty and moral relativism.Christian B. Miller - 2002 - European Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):354–374.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-10-14
Downloads
82 (#194,957)
6 months
19 (#116,702)
2012-10-14
Downloads
82 (#194,957)
6 months
19 (#116,702)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
A pragmatic, existentialist approach to the scientific realism debate.Curtis Forbes - 2017 - Synthese 194 (9):3327-3346.
How rational can a polemic across the analytic -continental 'divide' be?Marcelo Dascal - 2001 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3):313 – 339.
What Would it Mean to Call Rorty a Deliberative Democrat?Susan Dieleman - 2017 - Contemporary Pragmatism 14 (3):319-333.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-9lpj8 uwo