Protecting Research Subjects: IRBs in a Changing Research Landscape

&
IRB: Ethics & Human Research 33 (2):14-19 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Given the many changes in the research environment since the model for the institutional review board was codified in 1981, tensions may arise as IRBs try to fulfill their obligation to protect human subjects while confronted with competing goals to advance science and support the interests of researchers and their institutions. This study was designed to learn how different types of IRBs carry out their basic functions in overseeing human subjects research and to discover how IRB members perceive their obligations in light of competing goals and the resulting tensions

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Nuts and Bolts of IRBs.Don Workman - 2007 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 29 (2).
The Protectors and the Protected: What Regulators and Researchers Can Learn from IRB Members and Subjects.Ann Freeman Cook, Helena Hoas & Jane Clare Joyner - 2013 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 3 (1):51-65.
IRBs and the Protection-Inclusion Dilemma: Finding a Balance.Phoebe Friesen, Luke Gelinas, Aaron Kirby, David H. Strauss & Barbara E. Bierer - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):75-88.
Conflicting interests, social justice and proxy consent to research.Daryl Pullman - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (5):523 – 545.
The Editor and the IRB: Should Journals Notify IRBs about Possibly Unethical Research with Human Subjects?Judith P. Swazey - 1986 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 8 (5):10.
Institutional Review Board (IRB): US Perspectives.Maria I. Lapid, Yves Ouellette, Matthew T. Drake & Bart L. Clarke - 2023 - In Erick Valdés & Juan Alberto Lecaros (eds.), Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume II: Scientific Integrity and Institutional Ethics. Springer Verlag. pp. 2147483647-2147483647.
Children as Research Subjects: New Guidelines for Canadian IRBs.David C. Flagel - 2000 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 22 (5):1.
Study of Protection for Human Subjects Should Examine the Entire Universe of IRBs.Erica J. Heath - 1993 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 15 (6):10.
Problems with Minimal-Risk Research Oversight: A Threat to Academic Freedom?Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2009 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (3):11.
The importance of virtue ethics in the IRB.Marilyn C. Morris & Jason Z. Morris - 2016 - Research Ethics 12 (4):201-216.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
1 (#1,722,932)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references