Response to Open Peer Commentaries for “There’s No Harm in Talking: Reestablishing the Relationship Between Theological and Secular Bioethics”

, &
American Journal of Bioethics 21 (1):W1-W3 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The global landscape in which we wrote this essay has fundamentally changed. Given how these changes have altered the rhythm of life, particularly the added responsibilities that many of you have a...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2020.1850909

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

There’s No Harm in Talking: Re-Establishing the Relationship Between Theological and Secular Bioethics.Michael McCarthy, Mary Homan & Michael Rozier - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):5-13.
‘There’s No Harm in Talking’…True…But It Depends on How We Talk and What We Then Do.Patrick T. Smith - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):32-34.
Correlating Bioethics and Theology.Nathan Carlin - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):49-51.
Talking Can Be Harmful Depending on What You Say.Cynthia M. A. Geppert & Toby Schonfeld - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):42-44.
The Social Context of Religion in the Jurisdictions of Bioethics.John H. Evans - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):1-4.
An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”.Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
Talking at Cross Purposes: Why We Shouldn’t Re-Establish the Relationship Between Theological and Secular Bioethics.Heidi Matisonn - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):45-47.
Response to open Peer commentaries on “why treat the wounded?”.Michael L. Gross - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2):W1 – W3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World”.Angela J. Ballantyne - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):4-6.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Bioethical Considerations in Translational Research: Primate Stroke”.Michael E. Sughrue - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (5):W1-W3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Texas Advanced Directive Law: Unfinished Business”.Stuart J. Youngner & Michael Kapattos - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):6-7.
Purely Faith-Based vs. Rationally-Informed Theological Bioethics.Jason T. Eberl - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):14-16.
Community, Complicity, and Critique: Christian Concepts in Secular Bioethics.Aline H. Kalbian, Courtney S. Campbell & James F. Childress - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):37-39.
Ethical Management of Diagnostic Uncertainty: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Why Bioethics Should Be Concerned With Medically Unexplained Symptoms”.Diane O’Leary - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):W6-W11.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Addressing Consent Issues in Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death”.Kim J. Overby, Michael S. Weinstein & Autumn Fiester - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):3-5.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-30

Downloads
7 (#1,281,834)

6 months
3 (#760,965)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Devil in the Details.Nicholas Colgrove - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):18-20.
Purely Faith-Based vs. Rationally-Informed Theological Bioethics.Jason T. Eberl - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):14-16.

View all 16 references / Add more references