Supervaluationism: Truth, Value and Degree Functionality

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):136-144 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article deals with supervaluationism and the failure of truth-functionality. It draws some distinctions that may contribute to a better understanding of this semantic framework

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Truth-Functionality.Daniel J. Hill & Stephen K. Mcleod - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (4):628-632.
Truth-functionality.Benjamin Schnieder - 2008 - Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (1):64-72.
Three dogmas of 'if'.Rani Lill Anjum - 2008 - In A. Leirfall & T. Sandmel (eds.), Enhet i Mangfold. Unipub.
On the structures inside truth-table degrees.Frank Stephan - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):731-770.
Quantum Logic and Meaning.Geoffrey Hellman - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:493 - 511.
Reinflating Logical Consequence.Owen Griffiths - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic (1):1-9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-05-16

Downloads
114 (#155,691)

6 months
14 (#176,812)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Pablo Cobreros
Universidad de Navarra
Luca Tranchini
Universität Tübingen

References found in this work

Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1996 - New York: Routledge.
Saving truth from paradox.Hartry H. Field - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Vagueness, truth and logic.Kit Fine - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):265-300.
Theories of Vagueness.Rosanna Keefe - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references