Radical Interpretation, Feminism, and Science

Dialogues with Davidson (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter’s main topic revolves around Davidson’s account of radical interpretation and the concept of triangulation as a necessary feature of communication and the formation of beliefs. There are two important implications of this model of belief formation for feminists studying the effects of social location on knowledge production generally, and the production of scientific knowledge in particular. The first is Davidson’s argument that whatever there is to the meaning of any of our beliefs must be available from the radical interpreter’s external, third-person perspective. The second important implication of triangulation is that Davidson’s model is a holistic one that shows that there is no substantive difference in the triangulation process by which we form beliefs concerning basic descriptive features of the world and beliefs concerning evaluative features of the world.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Feminism and ecology: Making connections.Karen J. Warren - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (1):3-20.
Radically speaking: feminism reclaimed.Diane Bell & Renate Klein (eds.) - 1996 - North Melbourne, Vic.: Spinifex Press.
Feminist political theory: an introduction.Valerie Bryson - 1992 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Feminism and Metaphysics: Unmasking Hidden Ontologies.Sally Haslanger - 2000 - Apa Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy 99 (2):192--196.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-28

Downloads
729 (#21,298)

6 months
112 (#34,689)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sharyn Clough
Oregon State University

Citations of this work

Ethical Evidence.Steven Diggin - 2022 - Synthese 200 (4):1-24.
The Descriptive, the Normative, and the Entanglement of Values in Science.Matthew J. Brown - 2021 - In Heather Douglas & Ted Richards (eds.), Science, Values, and Democracy: The 2016 Descartes Lectures. Tempe, AZ, and Washington, DC: Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, Arizona State University. pp. 51-65.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references