Against “We,” or an Argument for a Pluralistic Definition of Personhood in Bioethics

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 8 (3):173-174 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A confucian view of personhood and bioethics.Erika Yu & Ruiping Fan - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):171-179.
Defining death for persons and human organisms.John P. Lizza - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (5):439-453.
The Fallacy of the Slippery Slope Argument on Abortion.Chenyang Li - 1992 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (2):233-237.
Bioethics and Public Reason: A Report on Ethics and Public Discourse in Spain.Adela Cortina - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (3):241.
Personhood and community.Pedro Alexis Tabensky - 2004 - South African Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):54-68.
On the pluralistic conception of logic.Zoltán Vecsey - 2010 - Pragmatics and Cognition 18 (1):1-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
5 (#1,533,504)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tod Chambers
Northwestern University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Against Narrativity.Galen Strawson - 2004 - Ratio 17 (4):428-452.
Is That the Same Person? Case Studies in Neurosurgery.Nancy S. Jecker & Andrew L. Ko - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 8 (3):160-170.

Add more references