Continental Philosophy Review 42 (4):483-509 (2009)
AbstractIn modern continental thought, natural science is widely portrayed as an exclusively instrumental mode of reason. The breadth of this consensus has partly preempted the question of how it came to persuade. The process of persuasion, as it played out in Germany, can be explored by reconstructing the intellectual exchanges among three twentieth-century theorists of science, Heidegger, Habermas, and Werner Heisenberg. Taking an iconic Heisenberg as a kind of limiting case of “the scientist,” Heidegger and Habermas each found themselves driven to place new constraints on their previously more capacious assessments of science, especially its capacity to reflect on its method. Tracing how that happened, through archival and historical contextualization and close readings of their texts, lets us make visible Heidegger and Habermas’s intellectual affinities and argumentative parallels, which derived not only from their shared grounding in earlier reactions against positivism, but also from confrontation with contemporary events. The latter included, for Heidegger, the rise of a technically powerful science exemplified by nuclear physics, and for Habermas, post-World War II controversies over science, technology, and their socially critical possibilities
Similar books and articles
Phenomenology, Ontology, and Quantum Physics.Patrick A. Heelan - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (2):379-385.
Rethinking the Critique of Instrumental Reason.Roger Foster - 2006 - Social Philosophy Today 22:169-184.
Communicative reason and religion: The case of Habermas.Pieter Duvenage - 2010 - Sophia 49 (3):343-357.
Encounters with Einstein: And Other Essays on People, Places, and Particles.Werner Heisenberg - 1983 - Princeton University Press.
Art, truth and vocation: Validity and disclosure in Heidegger’s anti-aesthetics.Lambert Zuidervaart - 2002 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (2):153-172.
Autonomy and quantum physics: Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Heisenberg.Hans Seigfried - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (4):619-630.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Scrutinizing Scientism from a Hermeneutic Point of View.Dimitri Ginev - 2013 - Social Epistemology 27 (1):68 - 89.
Heidegger’s thinking on the “Same” of science and technology.Lin Ma & Jaap van Brakel - 2014 - Continental Philosophy Review 47 (1):19-43.
The Scope and Multidimensionality of the Scientific Realism Debate.Howard Sankey & Dimitri Ginev - 2011 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (2):263-283.
Pode o homem ainda encontrar a si mesmo? /Can man still encounter himself?Alexandre de Oliveira Ferreira - 2013 - Natureza Humana 15 (1).
Komplementäre Korrespondenz.Christina Vagt - 2011 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 19 (4):391-406.
References found in this work
The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays.Martin Heidegger - 1977 - Harper & Row.
One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society.Herbert Marcuse - 1964 - Routledge.