Tapping Habermas’s Discourse Theory for Environmental Ethics

Environmental Ethics 31 (4):339-357 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although other quasi-Kantian theories have been adapted, Jürgen Habermas’s discourse theory has been largely ignored in discussions of environmental ethics. Indeed on some versions of what an environmental philosophy must entail, Habermas’s anthropocentric approach must be disqualified from the start. Yet, there are some environmentally friendly implications of his discourse theory. They may not give us everything we would wish, but in the contemporary political context we must treasure any moral theory that can draw on the still-extensive theoretical and political resources of liberalism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The moral imaginary of discourse ethics.Kenneth MacKendrick - 2000 - Critical Horizons 1 (2):247-269.
Habermas on Nature.Yogi Hale Hendlin & Konrad Ott - 2016 - Environmental Ethics 38 (2):183-208.
Discourse Ethics and Nature.Angelika Krebs - 1997 - Environmental Values 6 (3):269-279.
Conflict and Universal Moral Theory.Eva Erman - 2007 - Political Theory 35 (5):598-623.
Ethics, the Environment, and Us.Peishan Shieh - 2000 - Dissertation, Portland State University
Modernity and morality in Habermas's discourse ethics.James Gordon Finlayson - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):319 – 340.
Habermas, modernity, and law.Mathieu Deflem (ed.) - 1996 - Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
49 (#319,158)

6 months
6 (#510,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references