Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (1):95-103 (2016)
AbstractIn recent years, discussion around memory modification interventions has gained attention. However, discussion around the use of memory interventions in the criminal justice system has been mostly absent. In this paper we start by highlighting the importance memory has for human well-being and personal identity, as well as its role within the criminal forensic setting; in particular, for claiming and accepting legal responsibility, for moral learning, and for retribution. We provide examples of memory interventions that are currently available for medical purposes, but that in the future could be used in the forensic setting to modify criminal offenders’ memories. In this section we contrast the cases of dampening and enhancing memories of criminal offenders. We then present from a pragmatic approach some pressing ethical issues associated with these types of memory interventions. The paper ends up highlighting how these pragmatic considerations can help establish ethically justified criteria regarding the possibility of interventions aimed at modifying criminal offenders’ memories.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.Harry Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.Harry Frankfurt - 2004 - In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work
The Memory-Modifying Potential of Optogenetics and the Need for Neuroethics.Agnieszka K. Adamczyk & Przemysław Zawadzki - 2020 - NanoEthics 14 (3):207-225.
Prefrontal Electrical Stimulation in Non-Depressed Reduces Levels of Reported Negative Affects From Daily Stressors.Nick J. Davis - 2017 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11.
Similar books and articles
Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity.Thomas Douglas - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (2):101-122.
Changing the Criminal Character: Nanotechnology and Criminal Punishment.Katrina Sifferd - 2012 - In A. Santosuosso (ed.), Proceedings of the 2011 Law and Science Young Scholars Symposium. Pavia University Press.
Direct Brain Interventions and Responsibility Enhancement.Elizabeth Shaw - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):1-20.
Retributive, Restorative and Ritualistic Justice.Kimberley Brownlee - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (2):385-397.
The Impact of DNA Exonerations on the Criminal Justice System.Margaret A. Berger - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):320-327.
Neuroscience and Criminal Justice: Introduction.Jesper Ryberg - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (2):77-80.
Behavioural Genetics in Criminal Cases: Past, Present and Future.Nita Farahany & William Bernet - 2006 - Genomics, Society and Policy 2 (1):72-79.
Memory Enhancement: The Issues We Should Not Forget About.Laura Cabrera - 2011 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 22 (1):97-109.
""The" Ultimate Issue" Problem in the Canadian Criminal Justice System.Marc Nesca - 2009 - Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 2 (1):11.
Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice.Nicola Lacey - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (164):374.
Reconciling the Criminal and Participatory Responsibilities of the Youth.Nicholas John Munn - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (1):139-159.
Ethical Issues in Forensic Psychiatric Research on Mentally Disordered Offenders.Susanna Radovic Christian Munthe - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (1):35-44.