Memory Interventions in the Criminal Justice System: Some Practical Ethical Considerations

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (1):95-103 (2016)

Abstract

In recent years, discussion around memory modification interventions has gained attention. However, discussion around the use of memory interventions in the criminal justice system has been mostly absent. In this paper we start by highlighting the importance memory has for human well-being and personal identity, as well as its role within the criminal forensic setting; in particular, for claiming and accepting legal responsibility, for moral learning, and for retribution. We provide examples of memory interventions that are currently available for medical purposes, but that in the future could be used in the forensic setting to modify criminal offenders’ memories. In this section we contrast the cases of dampening and enhancing memories of criminal offenders. We then present from a pragmatic approach some pressing ethical issues associated with these types of memory interventions. The paper ends up highlighting how these pragmatic considerations can help establish ethically justified criteria regarding the possibility of interventions aimed at modifying criminal offenders’ memories.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,722

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-30

Downloads
40 (#287,894)

6 months
1 (#387,390)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.Harry Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
The Constitution of Selves.Marya Schechtman (ed.) - 1996 - Cornell University Press.
Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.Harry Frankfurt - 2004 - In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.
Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century.Neil Levy - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Similar books and articles

Direct Brain Interventions and Responsibility Enhancement.Elizabeth Shaw - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):1-20.
Retributive, Restorative and Ritualistic Justice.Kimberley Brownlee - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (2):385-397.
The Impact of DNA Exonerations on the Criminal Justice System.Margaret A. Berger - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):320-327.
Neuroscience and Criminal Justice: Introduction.Jesper Ryberg - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (2):77-80.
Desert and Fairness in Criminal Justice.Erin I. Kelly - 2012 - Philosophical Topics 40 (1):63-77.
Memory Enhancement: The Issues We Should Not Forget About.Laura Cabrera - 2011 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 22 (1):97-109.
""The" Ultimate Issue" Problem in the Canadian Criminal Justice System.Marc Nesca - 2009 - Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 2 (1):11.
Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice.Nicola Lacey - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (164):374.
Terrorizing Criminal Law.Lucia Zedner - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):99-121.