Psychological Review 123 (2):228-233 (2016)

Authors
Stephen Andrew Butterfill
University of Warwick
Abstract
In this response to the commentary by Michael and Christensen, we first explain how minimal mindreading is compatible with the development of increasingly sophisticated mindreading behaviours that involve both executive functions and general knowledge, and then sketch one approach to a minimal account of goal ascription.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1037/rev0000022
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Interacting Mindreaders.Stephen Andrew Butterfill - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):841-863.
Signature Limits in Mindreading Systems.J. Robert Thompson - 2014 - Cognitive Science 38 (7):1432-1455.
Shared Goals and Development.Olle Blomberg - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (258):94-101.
Mindreading in the Animal Kingdom.José Luis Bermúdez - 2009 - In Robert W. Lurz (ed.), The Philosophy of Animal Minds. Cambridge University Press.
Morality Without Mindreading.Susana Monsó - 2017 - Mind and Language 32 (3):338-357.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-05-08

Total views
155 ( #75,496 of 2,506,345 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,345 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes