25 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Ian A. Apperly [17]Ian Apperly [8]
  1. How to Construct a Minimal Theory of Mind.Stephen A. Butterfill & Ian A. Apperly - 2013 - Mind and Language 28 (5):606-637.
    What could someone represent that would enable her to track, at least within limits, others' perceptions, knowledge states and beliefs including false beliefs? An obvious possibility is that she might represent these very attitudes as such. It is sometimes tacitly or explicitly assumed that this is the only possible answer. However, we argue that several recent discoveries in developmental, cognitive, and comparative psychology indicate the need for other, less obvious possibilities. Our aim is to meet this need by describing the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   131 citations  
  2. Do Humans Have Two Systems to Track Beliefs and Belief-Like States?Stephen Andrew Butterfill & Ian A. Apperly - 2009 - Psychological Review 116 (4):953-970.
    The lack of consensus on how to characterize humans’ capacity for belief reasoning has been brought into sharp focus by recent research. Children fail critical tests of belief reasoning before 3 to 4 years (Wellman, Cross, & Watson, 2001; Wimmer & Perner, 1983), yet infants apparently pass false belief tasks at 13 or 15 months (Onishi & Baillargeon, 2005; Surian, Caldi, & Sperber, 2007). Non-human animals also fail critical tests of belief reasoning but can show very complex social behaviour (e.g., (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   213 citations  
  3. Mindreaders: The Cognitive Basis of "Theory of Mind".Ian Apperly - 2010 - Psychology Press.
    Introduction -- Evidence from children -- Evidence form infants and non-human animals -- Evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology -- Evidence from adults -- The cognitive basis of mindreading -- Elaborating and applying the theory.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   74 citations  
  4.  35
    Executive Function is Necessary for Perspective Selection, Not Level-1 Visual Perspective Calculation: Evidence From a Dual-Task Study of Adults.Adam W. Qureshi, Ian A. Apperly & Dana Samson - 2010 - Cognition 117 (2):230-236.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   43 citations  
  5.  34
    Similarities and Differences in Visual and Spatial Perspective-Taking Processes.Andrew Surtees, Ian Apperly & Dana Samson - 2013 - Cognition 129 (2):426-438.
  6.  27
    Unintentional Perspective-Taking Calculates Whether Something is Seen, but Not How It is Seen.Andrew Surtees, Dana Samson & Ian Apperly - 2016 - Cognition 148:97-105.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  7.  27
    Two Sources of Evidence on the Non-Automaticity of True and False Belief Ascription.Elisa Back & Ian A. Apperly - 2010 - Cognition 115 (1):54-70.
  8.  15
    I’Ve Got Your Number: Spontaneous Perspective-Taking in an Interactive Task.Andrew Surtees, Ian Apperly & Dana Samson - 2016 - Cognition 150:43-52.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  9.  28
    Making Tools Isn’T Child’s Play.Sarah R. Beck, Ian A. Apperly, Jackie Chappell, Carlie Guthrie & Nicola Cutting - 2011 - Cognition 119 (2):301-306.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  10.  36
    Beyond Simulation–Theory and Theory–Theory: Why Social Cognitive Neuroscience Should Use its Own Concepts to Study “Theory of Mind”.Ian A. Apperly - 2008 - Cognition 107 (1):266-283.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  11.  15
    The Cost of Thinking About False Beliefs: Evidence From Adults’ Performance on a Non-Inferential Theory of Mind Task.Ian A. Apperly, Elisa Back, Dana Samson & Lisa France - 2008 - Cognition 106 (3):1093-1108.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  12. Domain-Specificity and Theory of Mind: Evaluating Neuropsychological Evidence.Ian A. Apperly, Dana Samson & Glyn W. Humphreys - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (12):572-577.
  13.  21
    Can Theory of Mind Grow Up? Mindreading in Adults, and its Implications for the Development and Neuroscience of Mindreading.Ian Apperly - 2013 - In Simon Baron-Cohen, Michael Lombardo & Helen Tager-Flusberg (eds.), Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives From Developmental Social Neuroscience. Oxford University Press. pp. 72.
  14.  11
    Task Constraints Distinguish Perspective Inferences From Perspective Use During Discourse Interpretation in a False Belief Task.Heather J. Ferguson, Ian Apperly, Jumana Ahmad, Markus Bindemann & James Cane - 2015 - Cognition 139:50-70.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  15. Is Goal Ascription Possible in Minimal Mindreading?Stephen A. Butterfill & Ian A. Apperly - 2016 - Psychological Review 123 (2):228-233.
    In this response to the commentary by Michael and Christensen, we first explain how minimal mindreading is compatible with the development of increasingly sophisticated mindreading behaviours that involve both executive functions and general knowledge, and then sketch one approach to a minimal account of goal ascription.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  16.  28
    Testing the Domain-Specificity of a Theory of Mind Deficit in Brain-Injured Patients: Evidence for Consistent Performance on Non-Verbal, “Reality-Unknown” False Belief and False Photograph Tasks.Ian A. Apperly, Dana Samson, Claudia Chiavarino, Wai-Ling Bickerton & Glyn W. Humphreys - 2007 - Cognition 103 (2):300-321.
  17.  31
    Mindreading and Psycholinguistic Approaches to Perspective Taking: Establishing Common Ground.Ian Apperly - 2018 - Topics in Cognitive Science 10 (1):133-139.
    In this commentary on “Memory and Common Ground Processes in Language Use,” I draw attention to relevant work on mindreading. The concerns of research on common ground and mindreading have significant overlap, but these literatures have worked in relative isolation of each other. I attempt an assimilation, pointing out shared and distinctive concerns and mutually informative results.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18.  26
    Developmental Studies and the Domain-Specificity of Belief Reasoning.Ian A. Apperly, Dana Samson & Glyn W. Humphreys - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (12):572-577.
  19.  14
    Is Tool-Making Knowledge Robust Over Time and Across Problems?Sarah R. Beck, Nicola Cutting, Ian A. Apperly, Zoe Demery, Leila Iliffe, Sonia Rishi & Jackie Chappell - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
  20. Distinguishing Intentions From Desires: Contributions of the Frontal and Parietal Lobes.Claudia Chiavarino, Ian A. Apperly & Glyn W. Humphreys - 2010 - Cognition 117 (2):203-216.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  21.  19
    Tool Innovation May Be a Critical Limiting Step for the Establishment of a Rich Tool-Using Culture: A Perspective From Child Development.Sarah R. Beck, Jackie Chappell, Ian A. Apperly & Nicola Cutting - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (4):220-221.
    Recent data show that human children (up to 8 years old) perform poorly when required to innovate tools. Our tool-rich culture may be more reliant on social learning and more limited by domain-general constraints such as ill-structured problem solving than otherwise thought.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  22.  35
    Symposium on S. Butterfill and I. Apperly, "How to Construct a Minimal Theory of Mind".Stephen Butterfill, Ian Apperly, Hannes Rakoczy, Shannon Spaulding & Tadeusz Zawidzki - 2013 - Mind and Language Symposia at the Brains Blog.
  23.  12
    How is Mindreading Really Like Reading?Ian A. Apperly - 2019 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42.
    I suggest an alternative basis for Heyes’ analogy between cultural learning of mindreading and text reading. Unlike text reading, mindreading does not entail decoding of observable stimuli. Like text reading, mindreading requires relevant inferences. Identification of relevant inferences is a deeply challenging problem, and the most important contribution of cultural learning to mindreading may be an apprenticeship in thinking like a mindreader.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  10
    The Benefit of Seeing in Company.Ian A. Apperly - 2019 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 23 (6):451-453.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  15
    The Development of Co-Representation Effects in a Joint Task: Do Children Represent a Co-Actor?Sophie J. Milward, Sotaro Kita & Ian A. Apperly - 2014 - Cognition 132 (3):269-279.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark