Mind and Language 32 (3):338-357 (2017)

Authors
Susana Monsó
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
Abstract
Could animals behave morally if they can’t mindread? Does morality require mindreading capacities? Moral psychologists believe mindreading is contingently involved in moral judgements. Moral philosophers argue that moral behaviour necessarily requires the possession of mindreading capacities. In this paper, I argue that, while the former may be right, the latter are mistaken. Using the example of empathy, I show that animals with no mindreading capacities could behave on the basis of emotions that possess an identifiable moral content. Therefore, at least one type of moral motivation does not require mindreading. This means that, a priori, non-mindreading animals can be moral.
Keywords Nonhuman animals  Morality  Moral judgement  Mindreading/theory of mind  Empathy  Moral behaviour  Moral emotions
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
DOI 10.1111/mila.12146
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading.Amy Coplan - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (1):94-97.
Empathy: Its Ultimate and Proximate Bases.Stephanie D. Preston & Frans B. M. de Waal - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):1-20.
Uneasy Virtue.Julia Driver - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Animal Moral Psychologies.Susana Monsó & Kristin Andrews - forthcoming - In John M. Doris & Manuel Vargas (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Caring animals and care ethics.Birte Wrage - 2022 - Biology and Philosophy 37 (3):1-20.
Consciousness and Memory: A Transactional Approach.Carlos Montemayor - 2018 - Essays in Philosophy 19 (2):231-252.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Empathy and Morality in Behaviour Readers.Susana Monsó - 2015 - Biology and Philosophy 30 (5):671-690.
Mind Misreading.Shannon Spaulding - 2016 - Philosophical Issues 26 (1).
Mindreading in Infancy.Peter Carruthers - 2013 - Mind and Language 28 (2):141-172.
Embodied Cognition and Mindreading.Shannon Spaulding - 2010 - Mind and Language 25 (1):119-140.
Social-Affective Origins of Mindreading and Metacognition.Philippe Rochat - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):160-161.
Rejecting Empathy for Animal Ethics.T. J. Kasperbauer - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (4):817-833.
Mindreading in the Animal Kingdom.José Luis Bermúdez - 2009 - In Robert W. Lurz (ed.), The Philosophy of Animal Minds. Cambridge University Press.
Recognizing Nonhuman Morality.Simon J. Coghlan - 2014 - Between the Species 17 (1).
Signature Limits in Mindreading Systems.J. Robert Thompson - 2014 - Cognitive Science 38 (7):1432-1455.
We Read Minds to Shape Relationships.Vivian Bohl - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (5):674-694.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-03-09

Total views
458 ( #20,457 of 2,505,696 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #15,357 of 2,505,696 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes