Comment on "Comparative Philosophy: In Response to Rorty and Macintyre" by Rui Zhu

Philosophy East and West 68 (1):266-270 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The brief response by Rui Zhu provides an interesting take on the perennial problem of what comparative philosophy is or should be. While Zhu makes some interesting observations about and suggestions for comparative philosophy, he chooses contributions to the thinking about the possibilities and methodologies of comparative philosophy that are rather old, though, and my first wonder is: why these two papers, and not more recent contributions to the development of the methodology of comparative philosophy, as can be found in numerous recently published work? Such more recent publications tend to take a more nuanced approach to the idea of commensurability than the two essays from 1991, given the...



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comparative Philosophy: In Response to Rorty and MacIntyre.Rui Zhu - 2017 - Philosophy East and West 68 (1):264-266.
Reply to Steven Burik.Rui Zhu & Corey Beckford - 2017 - Philosophy East and West 68 (1):271-276.
Comparative Philosophy and Cultural Patterns.Chenyang Li - 2016 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 15 (4):533-546.


Added to PP

17 (#891,762)

6 months
2 (#1,250,447)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven Burik
Singapore Management University

Citations of this work

Convergence of Dao with the Apophatism.Stefan Vladutescu - 2018 - Postmodern Openings 9 (1):129-146.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references