Comparative Philosophy: In Response to Rorty and MacIntyre

Philosophy East and West 68 (1):264-266 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Comparative philosophy, as a self-conscious form of intercultural studies, may imply either a general comparative gaze that happens to be directed at philosophy or a branch of philosophy, or doing philosophy, characterized by its comparative methodology or subject matter or both. Even though comparing philosophies and philosophizing through comparisons are inevitably entangled, the difference between the two is sufficiently strong so as to justify their separation here, not least for the sake of making what I believe an important theoretical point.Comparing philosophies of possibly incommensurable traditions, as both MacIntyre and Rorty have argued from their distinctive vantage points, can be, albeit tricky or...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Steven Burik.Rui Zhu & Corey Beckford - 2017 - Philosophy East and West 68 (1):271-276.
Comparative Philosophy and Cultural Patterns.Chenyang Li - 2016 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 15 (4):533-546.
Comparative Philosophy and the Tertium: Comparing What with What, and in What Respect?Ralph Weber - 2014 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (2):151-171.
Introducing Confluence.Monika Kirloskar-Steinbach, Geeta Ramana & James Maffie - 2014 - Confluence: Online Journal of World Philosophies 1 (1):7-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-28

Downloads
29 (#548,607)

6 months
4 (#778,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rui Zhu
Aalborg University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references