The New Genetics and Informed Consent: Differentiating Choice to Preserve Autonomy
Bioethics 27 (6):348-355 (2013)
Abstract
The advent of new genetic and genomic technologies may cause friction with the principle of respect for autonomy and demands a rethinking of traditional interpretations of the concept of informed consent. Technologies such as whole-genome sequencing and micro-array based analysis enable genome-wide testing for many heterogeneous abnormalities and predispositions simultaneously. This may challenge the feasibility of providing adequate pre-test information and achieving autonomous decision-making. At a symposium held at the 11th World Congress of Bioethics in June 2012 (Rotterdam), organized by the International Association of Bioethics, these challenges were presented for three different areas in which these so-called ‘new genetics’ technologies are increasingly being applied: newborn screening, prenatal screening strategies and commercial personal genome testing. In this article, we build upon the existing ethical framework for a responsible set-up of testing and screening offers and reinterpret some of its criteria in the light of the new genetics. As we will argue, the scope of a responsible testing or screening offer should align with the purpose(s) of testing and with the principle of respect for autonomy for all stakeholders involved, including (future) children. Informed consent is a prerequisite but requires a new approach. We present preliminary and general directions for an individualized or differentiated set-up of the testing offer and for the informed consent process. With this article we wish to contribute to the formation of new ideas on how to tackle the issues of autonomy and informed consent for (public) healthcare and direct-to-consumer applications of the new geneticsDOI
10.1111/bioe.12030
My notes
Similar books and articles
Informed Consent in Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing: The Outline of A Model between Specific and Generic Consent.Eline M. Bunnik, A. Cecile J. W. Janssens & Maartje H. N. Schermer - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (3):343-351.
Challenging the rhetoric of choice in prenatal screening.Victoria Seavilleklein - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (1):68-77.
Routine screening: Informed consent, stigma and the waning of HIV exceptionalism.Matthew K. Wynia - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):5 – 8.
Krabbe Newborn Screening: The Issue of Informed Consent.Niels Nijsingh - 2013 - Public Health Ethics 6 (1):126-128.
The Ethics of Krabbe Newborn Screening.R. H. Dees & J. M. Kwon - 2013 - Public Health Ethics 6 (1):114-128.
A new era in prenatal testing: are we prepared? [REVIEW]Dagmar Schmitz - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):357-364.
Maternal serum testing: Is invasive testing a passing era.Marcia Riordan - 2012 - Bioethics Research Notes 24 (1):7.
On Taylor's justification of medical informed consent.Jukka Varelius - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (4):207-214.
Informed consent as waiver: the doctrine rethought?Emma C. Bullock - 2010 - Ethical Perspectives 17 (4):529-555.
Informed Consent and Relational Conceptions of Autonomy.N. Stoljar - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):375-384.
Privacy and the human genome project.David L. Wiesenthal & Neil I. Wiener - 1996 - Ethics and Behavior 6 (3):189 – 202.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-05-30
Downloads
56 (#212,798)
6 months
2 (#298,943)
2013-05-30
Downloads
56 (#212,798)
6 months
2 (#298,943)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Qualifying choice: ethical reflection on the scope of prenatal screening.Greg Stapleton - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (2):195-205.
Trust in farm data sharing: reflections on the EU code of conduct for agricultural data sharing.Simone van der Burg, Leanne Wiseman & Jovana Krkeljas - 2020 - Ethics and Information Technology 23 (3):185-198.
Psychological and Ethical Challenges of Introducing Whole Genome Sequencing into Routine Newborn Screening: Lessons Learned from Existing Newborn Screening.Fiona Ulph & Rebecca Bennett - forthcoming - The New Bioethics:1-23.
The Devil is in the Details: Confidentiality Challenges in the Age of Genetics.Barbara J. Daly, Ashley Rosko, Shulin Zhang & Hillard M. Lazarus - 2015 - HEC Forum 27 (1):79-86.
Nichtinvasive Pränataltests als Teil der vorgeburtlichen Regelversorgung.Giovanni Rubeis, Marcin Orzechowski & Florian Steger - 2020 - Ethik in der Medizin 32 (1):49-63.