Krabbe Newborn Screening: The Issue of Informed Consent

Public Health Ethics 6 (1):126-128 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In their article, Dees and Kwon (2013) describe the case of newborn screening for Krabbe disease and argue compellingly that a mandatory newborn screening program for this disease is problematic in several respects. Therefore, they submit, testing on Krabbe disease should only be offered on a voluntary basis, under a research protocol. In my opinion, Dees and Kwon are correct to point out the problematic character of a mandatory screening program for Krabbe disease. Their move toward a research paradigm is however problematic. More specific, their proposal presents problems for the role of informed consent in Krabbe testing

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Krabbe Newborn Screening.R. H. Dees & J. M. Kwon - 2013 - Public Health Ethics 6 (1):114-128.
Mandatory versus voluntary consent for newborn screening?Lainie Friedman Ross - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (4):299-328.
Toward a Realistic Assessment of PKU Screening.Diane B. Paul - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:322 - 328.
Parental consent for newborn screening in southern Taiwan.M.-C. Huang - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (11):621-624.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-20

Downloads
93 (#180,495)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Ethics of Krabbe Newborn Screening.R. H. Dees & J. M. Kwon - 2013 - Public Health Ethics 6 (1):114-128.

Add more references