The Hasty British Ban on Commercial Surrogacy

Hastings Center Report 17 (1):16-19 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While commercial surrogate parenting arrangements continue to flourish in the U.S., Britain has made it a criminal offense for third parties to benefit from surrogacy. Voluntary surrogacy, however is still within the law. Banning commercial surrogacy while leaving voluntary surrogacy lawful seems neither logical nor fair. A more equitable solution would be to license stringently and control both commercial and nonprofit agencies to provide these services.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intersectionality and the Ethics of Transnational Commercial Surrogacy.Serene J. Khader - 2013 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 6 (1):68-90.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
22 (#702,999)

6 months
2 (#1,194,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Is There Anything Wrong with Surrogate Motherhood? An Ethical Analysis.Ruth Macklin - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):57-64.
Is There Anything Wrong with Surrogate Motherhood? An Ethical Analysis.Ruth Macklin - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):57-64.
SURROGACY:: For Love But Not for Money?Sharyn Roach Anleu - 1992 - Gender and Society 6 (1):30-48.
A Civil Liberties Analysis of Surrogacy Arrangements.Larry Gostin - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):7-17.
The morality of surrogate mothering.Lenore Kuo - 1989 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):361-380.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references