Touch me if you can: The intangible but grounded nature of abstract concepts

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thinking about what the senses cannot grasp is one of the hallmarks of human cognition. We argue that “intangible abstracta” are represented differently from other products of abstraction, that goal-derived categorization supports their learning, and that they are grounded also in internalized linguistic and social interaction. We conclude by suggesting different ways in which abstractness contributes to cement group cohesion.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A New Approach to the Grounding of Abstract Concepts.Tim Seuchter - 2011 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):53-63.
Curb Your Embodiment.Diane Pecher - 2018 - Topics in Cognitive Science 10 (3):501-517.
What is Touch?Matthew Ratcliffe - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):413 - 432.
Touch in the Abstract.Aden Evens - 2011 - Substance 40 (3):67-78.
Language as a disruptive technology: Abstract concepts, embodiment and the flexible mind.Guy Dove - 2018 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 1752 (373):1-9.
The Peculiarity of Emotional Words: A Grounded Approach.Claudia Mazzuca, Laura Barca & Anna Maria Borghi - 2017 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 8 (2):124-133.
Catching Berkeley's shadow.Tom Stoneham - 2011 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):116-136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-20

Downloads
16 (#903,096)

6 months
7 (#421,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?