Archimedeanism and Why Metaethics Matters

Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4:283-302 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Expressivism, Anti-Archimedeanism and Supervenience.Christine Tiefensee - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (2):163-181.
In Defense of Anti‐Archimedean Moral Realism: A Response to Recent Critics.Patrick Clipsham - 2013 - Metaphilosophy 44 (4):470-484.
How Objectivity Matters.David Enoch - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 5:111-52.
What matters about metaethics?Mark Schroeder - forthcoming - In Peter Singer (ed.), Does Anything Really Matter? Responses to Parfit.
How a Kantian can accept evolutionary metaethics.Frederick Rauscher - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):303-326.
Go Tell It on the Mountain.Bart Schultz - 2014 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (2):233-251.
Anti-archimedeanism.Arthur Ripstein - 2007 - In Ronald Dworkin. Cambridge University Press.
Parfit's Case Against Subjectivism.David Sobel - 2011 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, volume 6. Oxford University Press.
Opening questions, following rules.Paul Bloomfield - 2006 - In Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.), Metaethics After Moore. Oxford University Press. pp. 169.
Ethical Anti-Archimedeanism and Moral Error Theory.Mark Hanin - 2013 - Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (4):359-374.
On the relevance of metaethics: new essays on metaethics.Jocelyne Couture & Kai Nielsen (eds.) - 1995 - Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
Naturalistic metaethics at half price.Joshua Gert - 2010 - In Michael Brady (ed.), New Waves in Metaethics. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Troubling Developments in Metaethics. [REVIEW]James Dreier - 2002 - Noûs 36 (1):152 - 168.
Mental agency and metaethics.Matthew Evans & Nishi Shah - 2012 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 7:80-109.
Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. 5. [REVIEW]Michael Cholbi - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (3):459-462.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-31

Downloads
170 (#111,469)

6 months
117 (#32,244)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Bloomfield
University of Connecticut

Citations of this work

How to Measure Moral Realism.Thomas Pölzler - 2018 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9 (3):647-670.
Melis Erdur’s Moral Argument Against Moral Realism.Joshua Blanchard - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (2):371-377.
Law is not (best considered) an essentially contested concept.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2011 - International Journal of Law in Context 7:209-232.
Parfit über Intuitionismus und die Herausforderung moralischer Uneinigkeit.Kay Hüwelmeyer - 2016 - Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie 3 (2):287-324.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references