Metaphilosophy 44 (4):470-484 (2013)

Patrick Clipsham
Winona State University
Ronald Dworkin famously argued that many putatively nonmoral metaethical theories can only be understood as being internal to the moral domain. If correct, this position, referred to as anti-archimedeanism, has profound implications for the methodology of metaethics. This is particularly true for skeptical metaethical theories. This article defends a version of anti-archimedeanism that is true to the spirit rather than the letter of Dworkin's original thesis from several recent objections. First, it addresses Kenneth Ehrenberg's recent attempt to demonstrate how certain metaethical theories can be understood in a morally neutral manner. It then discusses Charles Pigden's claim that Dworkin begs the question against error theorists and nihilists by assuming a conceptual space that error theorists and nihilists would reject. It concludes that the anti-archimedean methodology originally proposed by Dworkin is defensible, and can be used to support a robust form of moral realism
Keywords error theory  moral realism  objectivity  metaethics  Ronald Dworkin  archimedeanism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/meta.12042
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,172
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Freedom and Reason.Richard Mervyn Hare - 1963 - Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Objectivity and Truth: You’D Better Believe It.Ronald Dworkin - 1996 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (2):87-139.
Ruling Passions.Simon Blackburn - 2000 - Philosophy 75 (293):454-458.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Metaethics for Everyone.Andrew Reisner - 2010 - Problema 4:39-64.
Archimedean Metaethics Defended.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):508-529.
Truthmaking, Metaethics, and Creeping Minimalism.Jamin Asay - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (1):213-232.
Anti-Archimedeanism.Arthur Ripstein - 2007 - In Ronald Dworkin. Cambridge University Press.
Must Metaethical Realism Make a Semantic Claim?Guy Kahane - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (2):148-178.
The Return of Moral Fictionalism.Nadeem J. Z. Hussain - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):149–188.
An Amoral Manifesto Part I.Joel Marks - 2010 - Philosophy Now (80):30-33.
An Amoral Manifesto Part II.Joel Marks - 2010 - Philosophy Now (81):23-26.


Added to PP index

Total views
67 ( #172,754 of 2,517,893 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,045 of 2,517,893 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes