The Ethics of Killing: Strengthening the Substance View with Time-relative Interests

The New Bioethics (Online):1-17 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The substance view is an account of personhood that regards all human beings as possessing instrinsic value and moral status equivalent to that of an adult human being. Consequently, substance view proponents typically regard abortion as impermissible in most circumstances. The substance view, however, has difficulty accounting for certain intuitions regarding the badness of death for embryos and fetuses, and the wrongness of killing them. Jeff McMahan’s time-relative interest account is designed to cater for such intuitions, and so I present a proposal for strengthening the substance view by incorporating McMahan’s account – the Dual-Aspect Account of the morality of killing. I show that it resolves some important issues for the substance view while preserving its central premise of moral equality for all human beings. I then compare the Dual-Aspect Account with McMahan’s Two-Tiered Account of the morality of killing, which he derives from his time-relative interest account.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Killing and the Time-relative Interest Account.Nils Holtug - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (3):169-189.
Time-Relative Interests and Abortion.S. Liao - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):242-256.
Abortion, Time-Relative Interests, and Futures Like Ours.Peter Nichols - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):493-506.
The Substance View: A Critique.Rob Lovering - 2012 - Bioethics 27 (5):263-70.
Permissible killing and the irrelevance of being human.Rahul Kumar - 2007 - The Journal of Ethics 12 (1):57-80.
How bad is death?Ben Bradley - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):111-127.
The Substance View: A Critique (Part 3).Rob Lovering - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (4):305-312.
Spinoza’s Two Views of Substance.Frank Lucash - 2011 - Dialogue 50 (3):537-555.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-09

Downloads
60 (#266,836)

6 months
11 (#232,787)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bruce P. Blackshaw
University of Birmingham

Citations of this work

Miscarriage, Abortion, and Disease.Tom Waters - 2023 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 48 (3):243-251.
Do fetuses have the same interests as their mothers?Helen Watt - 2022 - In Nicholas Colgrove, Bruce P. Blackshaw & Daniel Rodger (eds.), Agency, Pregnancy and Persons. Abingdon: Routledge. pp. 105-123.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations