A Critique of Henrik Friberg‐Fernros's Defense of the Substance View

Bioethics 30 (9):767-773 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Proponents of the substance view contend that abortion is seriously morally wrong because it is killing something with the same inherent value and right to life as you or I. Rob Lovering offers two innovative criticisms of the anti-abortion position taken by the substance view – the rescue argument and the problem of spontaneous abortion. Henrik Friberg-Fernros offers an interesting response to Lovering, but one I argue would be inconsistent with the anti-abortion stance taken by most substance view theorists.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,517

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-30

Downloads
36 (#440,129)

6 months
9 (#455,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references