“When I opened, he had gone”: Levinas’s Substitution as a Reading of Husserl and Heidegger

Discipline filosofiche. 24 (1):97-118 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I propose to look at Levinas’ constellation of figures: recurrence, obsession, persecution, substitution and saying, in chapter IV of Otherwise than Being. This is the core of his 1974 work. I tarry with a remark that Levinas makes there, “Our analyses lay claim to the spirit of Husserlian philosophy […] But […] the present work ventures beyond phenomenology”. Substitution thus returns to Husserl’s passive syntheses, arguing that not everything about sensibility and affect is meaningful or enters into associations of intentions. To dig beneath thematizing consciousness required that Levinas adapt Heidegger’s hermeneutic extension of phenomenology, with its pre-structures, to open phenomenology to interpretive dimensions of lived immediacy. The question of passivity would requires reading Husserl through Heidegger. The task of opposing responsibility to Heidegger’s fundamental ontology necessitates a return to Husserl’s phenomenology of passivity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lévinas and Heidegger: A Post‐Heideggerian Approach to Phenomenological Issues.Jacques Taminiaux - 2009-02-26 - In Chung‐Ying Cheng, Nicholas Bunnin, Dachun Yang & Linyu Gu (eds.), Lévinas. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 31–46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-23

Downloads
7 (#603,698)

6 months
11 (#1,140,922)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bettina Bergo
Université de Montréal

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references