Reply to professor Kirn

Political Theory 3 (3):328-330 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/009059177500300310

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Social contracts and corporations: A reply to Hodapp. [REVIEW]Thomas Donaldson - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (2):133 - 137.
Reply to professor Janson.Monroe C. Beardsley - 1970 - Metaphilosophy 1 (1):63–65.
Representation and presentation: A reply to professor Dickie.Monroe C. Beardsley - 1961 - Journal of Philosophy 58 (9):238-241.
Reply to Professor Brender and Professor Byrne.Phillip Cole - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:197-206.
Readings in moral philosophy.Arthur G. Kirn - 1965 - Windsor, Ont.,: University of Windsor Press.
The second epistemic way revisited: Reply to professor beard's, 'professor Lucas on omniscience'. [REVIEW]Billy Joe Lucas - 1997 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):143-162.
I. mathematical modeling of election predictions: Final reply to professor Aubert.Herbert A. Simon - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):231 – 232.
Logical constructivism, modal logic, and metaphysics: A reply to professor Pruss' ``professor Lucas' second epistemic way''. [REVIEW]Billy Joe Lucas - 2002 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (3):143-157.
On Philip L. Beardsley's "missing paradigm".Michael E. Kirn - 1975 - Political Theory 3 (3):323-328.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
30 (#533,521)

6 months
7 (#431,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references